Fragments

[Dan O'meara]

My point is that Hinrichs has avoided the prior frames that show Kennedy already reacting.

Which prior frames?

[John Iacoletti]

No. It proves that Hinrichs avoided prior frames that show Kennedy reacting to an exterior stimuli earlier than he (Hinrichs) is claiming.

Just because you think they "show Kennedy reacting to an exterior stimuli" doesn't mean that he was -- or that Hinrichs "avoided" anything.

[Bill Chapman]

Which prior frames?

From 224, just as Kennedy emerges from behind the sign
Hinrichs starts at 228

[Dan O'meara]

I get it. Hinrichs is assuming JFK was shot through the neck after which he was shot in the back. Instead of a through-and-through shot he thinks there's a bullet still in his neck  and a bullet stuck in his back. None of which turned up in the autopsy.

Painful

[Dan O'meara]

Does he also think Connally was shot in the back then shot in the front then shot in the wrist then shot in the leg?

 

[Bill Chapman]

Just because you think they "show Kennedy reacting to an exterior stimuli" doesn't mean that he was -- or that Hinrichs "avoided" anything.

I get it: Kennedy had car sickness and was barfing. And thanks, once again, for your always-useful input.

[Bill Chapman]

I get it. Hinrichs is assuming JFK was shot through the neck after which he was shot in the back. Instead of a through-and-through shot he thinks there's a bullet still in his neck  and a bullet stuck in his back. None of which turned up in the autopsy.

Painful

Thanks so much for your always-useful input