The Oswald Wallet Paradox

[Walt Cakebread]

Hosty??    You believe Hosty?     The FBI agent who swore that his scribbled notes meant that there were "two other men" with Caster when they were examining some rifles outside Mr truly's office at lunch time on Wednesday Nov 20, 1963.   Even though Mr Caster himself said that there were far more than just TWO other men present at that time.   Captain Fritz confronted Lee Oswald with the Carcano, and Lee Oswald had told Fritz that he had seen this "rifle and two others ( rifles) outside Mr Truley's office on the 1st floor of the TSBD,  the day before yesterday"

Hosty claimed that Lee was referring to "two Other men" and not two other rifles....   

I overlooked the most glaring example of Hosty being a liar.....  He destroyed vital evidence when he flushed Lee Oswald's note down the toilet ( At least he said that's what he did)  I doubt that he actually did that but when your dealing with a liar, how the hell can anybody be sure what is truth and what is a lie??

[Gerry Down]

It is a fact that there were some good identifiable palm and finger prints found on the cowl and fender of Tippit's patrol car......   ( apparently deposited by Tippit's killer when he leaned down and talked to Tippit through the wing window.)   We can be 100% certain that these prints were NOT deposited by Lee Oswald, because if they had been Lee's prints they would have been solid proof that Lee had left them on Tippit's car....And the cops would have shouted the information from the roof tops.   

I've never heard of any finger prints on Tippits car. Source?

[Izraul Hidashi]

Okay... but there were people saying that the whole Oswald wallet thing at the Tippit murder scene never happened, right? It wasn't true?

But we have the cops looking at it here, right?   https://photos.app.goo.gl/591zCj89ugBYPiS59

And here's a hand written note by the first cop on the scene who claims to have found it.  https://photos.app.goo.gl/CJcULTVrrtGE1Qps6

"First on the scene... found Oswald's wallet"  So that did happen, right?

Now I wasn't saying it was really Oswald's wallet. I was just pointing out that cops did indeed try to frame him. There's no way he had 2 wallets, so one of them was bogus, thus proving that Oswald was being framed. Right or wrong?

[Richard Smith]

Okay... but there were people saying that the whole Oswald wallet thing at the Tippit murder scene never happened, right? It wasn't true?

But we have the cops looking at it here, right?   https://photos.app.goo.gl/591zCj89ugBYPiS59

And here's a hand written note by the first cop on the scene who claims to have found it.  https://photos.app.goo.gl/CJcULTVrrtGE1Qps6

"First on the scene... found Oswald's wallet"  So that did happen, right?

Now I wasn't saying it was really Oswald's wallet. I was just pointing out that cops did indeed try to frame him. There's no way he had 2 wallets, so one of them was bogus, thus proving that Oswald was being framed. Right or wrong?

Again, there is no confirmation that this is Oswald's wallet.  You have a film/picture of the DPD at the scene looking at some object that appears to be a wallet or something similar.  It could belong anyone there including a witness or perhaps be something like Tippit's citation book.  It makes no sense to suggest someone was trying to frame Oswald but for some unspecified reason the DPD would suppress an Oswald wallet found at the murder scene.  That would be fantastic evidence against Oswald.  His wallet left at the scene of the crime. 

It's laughable to suggest that whomever planted the wallet could not have anticipated that Oswald might have another wallet on him when arrested.  And when in the apparent position to suppress one of these two wallets, they would decide to suppress the one planted at the murder scene! Wow - what a plan.  In which those framing Oswald suppress great evidence of his guilt that they planted at the murder scene for that very purpose.  Logic dictates it's not Oswald's wallet but belongs to someone else at the scene.  Likely a witness or Tippit. 

[Michael Walton]

It's laughable to suggest that whomever planted the wallet could not have anticipated that Oswald might have another wallet on him when arrested.

Absolutely, Dick! For 99% of the male population who go around with one, single wallet in their back pocket, it's just pure coincidence that the guy who was accused of killing the president and a policeman JUST SO HAPPENED to be walking around with two wallets. The same guy who supposedly was just some crazed schmuck who said he "...emphatically denied these charges."

Hahahaha!!!

[Jerry Freeman]

I've never heard of any finger prints on Tippits car. Source?

Sgt Barns from the crime lab found some smudged prints....
https://books.google.com/books?id=0UBNUSOMNhYC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=fingerprints+found+on+tippits+car+jfk&source=bl&ots=PraKw4Rjsc&sig=ACfU3U3N_awoLzpZYTZc1bLMbtXH8KugVg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjiqKao-4jpAhVLcq0KHdUbCPMQ6AEwA3oECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q

[John Iacoletti]

It's laughable to suggest that whomever planted the wallet could not have anticipated that Oswald might have another wallet on him when arrested.

Absolutely, Dick! For 99% of the male population who go around with one, single wallet in their back pocket, it's just pure coincidence that the guy who was accused of killing the president and a policeman JUST SO HAPPENED to be walking around with two wallets. The same guy who supposedly was just some crazed schmuck who said he "...emphatically denied these charges."

Hahahaha!!!

Not just two.  Five!

Ruth Paine turned over 2 more, and Marina an additional one that he left her money in.