The Oswald Wallet Paradox

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Oswald Wallet Paradox  (Read 22987 times)

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2020, 05:00:10 PM »
It only makes sense if you know what you are talking about including the sequence of events.  That apparently excludes you.  When Oswald bought the rifle he did not know he would be leaving it any crime scene to be discovered.  He didn't even know JFK would be coming to Dallas when he purchased his rifle.  He bought the rifle with the intent to shoot Gen. Walker and then hide it.  You are actually trying to argue that the use of an alias to buy a rifle lends itself to his innocence?  Wow.  Why do you think he used an alias to buy it?

Oh...well please go on and enlighten us with your knowledge about Oswald's intentions. Since you know what you're talking about.

So Oswald really was the one that bought that rifle huh? And did you accompany him to purchase it? Tell us why Oswald felt the need to purchase a rifle under an assumed name. What exactly was he worried about? That someone would trace a random bullet back to an unregistered rifle? Why wasn't it the same rifle that HE ordered from the ad? Since you're obviously so informed, why did the company send the wrong rifle to Mr. Hidell?

How do you even know he really purchased it? Because according to your genius, Oswald purchased that rifle under an assumed name because he was going to shoot the General. But he didn't want anyone to know he purchased that rifle, yet he showed it to everyone. Even posed all fancy like with it. 

How did Oswald miss the General, being such a damn good crack shot from the 6th floor? What else can you verify about Oswald's actions?

Can you share with us why Oswald decided to keep the fake ID for his rifle purchase in a wallet? Why did he keep his 38 revolver on him after killing a cop with it? What his mind set was there, Nostradamus lol  But you do make an interesting point. Oswald didn't know the President was coming. In fact, he probably didn't even know the exact route of the motorcade. Yet he still brought his trusty General killer to work, just in case.

He missed the General, but thought..., I won't miss the President... wherever he is.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2020, 02:09:35 AM by Izraul Hidashi »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2020, 07:08:12 PM »
I'm starting to wonder if people actually read things.  lol   "eyewitness Helen Markham."

Cite please. When did Markham said that the gunman handed something to Tippit?

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #16 on: March 10, 2020, 11:03:45 PM »
Cite please. When did Markham said that the gunman handed something to Tippit?

How I came to the conclusion that the witness FBI AGENT BARRETT was talking about is easy. But I know my brain works a little fast and I tend to lose people because I fail to describe what's going on in my head. So I'll go over it slowly for anyone who wasn't able to figure it out on their own.

Quote: "Dallas Police Captain Westbrook found Oswald's brown wallet next to where Tippit had fallen and showed it to FBI Agent Barrett."

Okay. Whether or not they really found a wallet isn't for me to say. Personally I don't believe they did. I think both the cops and FBI were full of shit. And neither were smart enough to figure anything out, so they just did what most of those low IQ imbeciles do... make shit up until the case fit their beliefs.

Let's continue.
 
FBI agent Barrett stated that "according to a witness, the gunman handed something through the open passenger-side window to Tippit inside the car. Somebody told me that they saw him reach in and hand something to Tippit through the window. I don't know who said it, and can't verify it, but it would follow that's how the wallet got there. And, the wallet was there. There's no getting around that. Westbrook had the wallet in his hand and asked me If I know who these people were. I don't think Westbrook would have been asking me questions about something unrelated to the situation and he had the wallet with those names in it. Later, I remember seeing photographs of the contents of the wallet: in which those two names were in it"



Did we get that so far? Clue #1. The words of FBI AGENT ROBERT BARRETT. I'm not saying what he claimed is true or isn't. I'm saying is that he claimed it. But we can't trust a damn thing anyone one them said. Those idiots either believed Oswald was guilty, or trying to frame him.

Now clearly he said, he doesn't know who said it, just that someone did. But we can easily figure it out.

"Photographer Ron Reiland, of WFAA-TV, was the only newsman at the Tippit scene who shot a motion sequence. Clue #2.

Reiland exposed approximately two minutes of silent footage that covered the search for Tippit's killer, and the arrest of Oswald. The initial footage shot at Tenth and Patton correlates to police returning to the Tippit shooting scene following the investigation of a suspect at the Jefferson Branch Library. Clue #3. Two minutes of footage.

The opening sequence shows police gathered around Tippit's squad car questioning eyewitness Helen Markham. Bam! There it is.

How do we know. Because #1. Barrnett mentioned he wasn't even aware that he was being filmed. #2. The film wasn't that long. #3. Barrnett Said he heard a witness say that before he actually looked at the wallet.

Not hard to figure out, or it shouldn't be. None of it is rocket science. It shouldn't be that difficult for grown ass men to figure these simple things out. The efforts to make Oswald look guilty are indisputable. And anyone who can't see that is a sleepwalking sheep.

I know that may come off as arrogant, but it's not. Yes, I have a few issues I know. Like my annoyance with people who are slow. My dad pushed chess on me before I could even walk, so my brain is constantly moving faster than I can form explanations for my thoughts. I tend to forget people don't automatically see things. I'm working on it.  But I'm not really here to make friends or shoot the shit either. I solve shit then move on. I don't need to spend years looking for answers to the same simple ass questions.

Some people believe the silly ass stories from the cops and FBI, how 1 man who couldn't shoot worth a shit was a lone assassin. It takes a special person to believe that nonsense. Some people look at a man like Trump, whose told over 15,000 lies already, and think..."yeah, he's trustworthy."




Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #17 on: March 10, 2020, 11:40:55 PM »
I know that may come off as arrogant,

You think?  :D

It would have been sufficient to just say that Barrett claimed that a witness said someone handed Tippit something through the window and that witness may have been Markham. But if it came from Helen “utter screwball” Markham, I wouldn’t put a whole lot of stock in it. She also claimed the gunman leaned in a rolled-up window, talked to Tippit after he was dead, and sat there by herself screaming for help for 15-20 minutes.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2020, 11:41:35 PM by John Iacoletti »

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2020, 01:47:34 PM »
FBI agent Barrett stated that "according to a witness, the gunman handed something through the open passenger-side window to Tippit inside the car. Somebody told me that they saw him reach in and hand something to Tippit through the window. I don't know who said it, and can't verify it, but it would follow that's how the wallet got there. And, the wallet was there. There's no getting around that. Westbrook had the wallet in his hand and asked me If I know who these people were. I don't think Westbrook would have been asking me questions about something unrelated to the situation and he had the wallet with those names in it. Later, I remember seeing photographs of the contents of the wallet: in which those two names were in it"


Oswald rested his hands on the open window of the car. This may have been misinterpreted as Oswald handing something to Tippit.

Couldn't Oswald just have two wallets though? Lots of people do.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2020, 04:47:05 PM »
Oswald rested his hands on the open window of the car. This may have been misinterpreted as Oswald handing something to Tippit.

Couldn't Oswald just have two wallets though? Lots of people do.

Oswald rested his hands on the open window of the car. This may have been misinterpreted as Oswald handing something to Tippit.


 Oswald    Tippit's killer rested his hands on the open window cowl and right front fender of the car. This may have been misinterpreted as Oswald
 The young man  handing something to Tippit.

It is a fact that there were some good identifiable palm and finger prints found on the cowl and fender of Tippit's patrol car......   ( apparently deposited by Tippit's killer when he leaned down and talked to Tippit through the wing window.)   We can be 100% certain that these prints were NOT deposited by Lee Oswald, because if they had been Lee's prints they would have been solid proof that Lee had left them on Tippit's car....And the cops would have shouted the information from the roof tops.   

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: The Oswald Wallet Paradox
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2020, 05:21:19 PM »