Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "smirk"  (Read 26135 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #136 on: December 10, 2019, 11:25:39 AM »
Advertisement
Here’s a quote from “When the News Went Live,” page158, by Bob Huffaker:


“But early in taking depositions, Griffin distrusted the police, and he doubted that Ruby had admitted deciding to kill Oswald when he saw the assassin at the midnight showup. Ruby had bragged that he’d known he was going for Oswald when he’d seen “that smirk on his face” before the cameras, and Pat might have misunderstood which Oswald photo opportunity he’d meant. Belli had argued that Ruby, having been armed at the midnight showup, could have shot Oswald then, but Ruby would later confess to Earl Warren that he’d lied about carrying his pistol that night. The Sunday transfer, then, would have been his first chance to get a shot at Oswald.”

So the “smirk” appears to have been a contributing factor for Ruby’s actions.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #136 on: December 10, 2019, 11:25:39 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #137 on: December 10, 2019, 07:15:32 PM »
Link that....please.

That brief exchange with Iacoletti has been removed by the admin and rightly so.
The admin took appropriate action.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 07:16:58 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #138 on: December 10, 2019, 07:24:04 PM »
No idea what you’re talking about. As usual.

The admin has removed the exchange
Yeah, it's that bad

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #138 on: December 10, 2019, 07:24:04 PM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2295
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #139 on: December 10, 2019, 08:41:07 PM »
That brief exchange with Iacoletti has been removed by the admin and rightly so.
The admin took appropriate action.

Good news, Bill. ;D

That was an "impeachable act". Iacoletti's ongoing behavior alone should result in a permanent ban.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #140 on: December 10, 2019, 09:16:30 PM »
Good news, Bill. ;D

That was an "impeachable act". Iacoletti's ongoing behavior alone should result in a permanent ban.

What “ongoing behavior”? Daring to dispute bogus nonfactual claims?

And Bill Chapman making another unsupported accusation. What’s new?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #140 on: December 10, 2019, 09:16:30 PM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2295
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #141 on: December 10, 2019, 09:37:57 PM »
What “ongoing behavior”? Daring to dispute bogus nonfactual claims?

And Bill Chapman making another unsupported accusation. What’s new?


You weren't banned? Even for a month. That says a lot about admin.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #142 on: December 10, 2019, 09:38:56 PM »
The admin has removed the exchange
Yeah, it's that bad

Did you actually report John for being mean to you?  :D What a pussy!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #142 on: December 10, 2019, 09:38:56 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #143 on: December 10, 2019, 09:43:13 PM »
You weren't banned? Even for a month. That says a lot about admin.

For what, Jerry?