The "smirk"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "smirk"  (Read 83689 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #147 on: December 11, 2019, 10:12:20 PM »
Ah, yet another knee-jerk reaction from yet another CT booblehead..
I suggest you get the facts before running your mouth

I don't need the facts before running my mouth if you don't provide any. Instead you refer to banned material, which should not be allowed, leaving us to speculate re your prev behavior. That might not be the case here but your vague in-your-endos re banned material left us no other choice. If you don't want anyone to speculate about sensitive material then don't bring it up. Otherwise, man up and reap what you sow.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #148 on: December 11, 2019, 10:57:26 PM »
Is that supposed to be evidence that it was Tatum?
I was wondering that too.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #149 on: December 12, 2019, 12:46:16 AM »
Lonnie Hudkins reporter, Frontline - Who was Lee Harvey Oswald @ about 29:58:

“At that time he had this little smirk on him”

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #150 on: December 12, 2019, 01:10:15 AM »
Is that supposed to be evidence that it was Tatum?

It was evidence that there was a red car on the scene. Now, is this where you challenge Benevides' colour perception? I mean, you lot can never be too sure, now can you..
« Last Edit: December 12, 2019, 01:12:22 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #151 on: December 12, 2019, 01:37:38 AM »
I don't need the facts before running my mouth if you don't provide any. Instead you refer to banned material, which should not be allowed, leaving us to speculate re your prev behavior. That might not be the case here but your vague in-your-endos re banned material left us no other choice. If you don't want anyone to speculate about sensitive material then don't bring it up. Otherwise, man up and reap what you sow.

As now-banned material, I'm loathe to repeat it.

I have screen shots of the originals.
And be advised that it was Iacoletti doing the sowing.

« Last Edit: December 12, 2019, 01:47:13 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #152 on: December 12, 2019, 01:42:37 AM »
Lonnie Hudkins reporter, Frontline - Who was Lee Harvey Oswald @ about 29:58:

“At that time he had this little smirk on him”

The hits just keep on comin'

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #153 on: December 12, 2019, 02:31:04 AM »
It was evidence that there was a red car on the scene.

So what?