When was CE142 discovered in the 6th floor SN?

[Colin Crow]

And now from Montgomery.....the "discoverer".

Montgomery, No More Silence

"I don’t remember exactly where I found the brown paper that Oswald had wrapped the rifle in. It was probably close to 36 inches long with tape on it and no writing. I recall that it was stuffed between the boxes, not lying out open on the floor as were the shell casings. Since we were looking for the rifle, we figured that it must have been used to wrap the rifle. None of the items had been touched at that time. Marvin and I also found the sack where he’d eaten, and I believe that he drank a Dr. Pepper. We later took the bottle back to the Crime Lab to dust it for prints".



What a joke.

Oh what a tangled web we weave.

[Jack Nessan]

And now from Montgomery.....the "discoverer".

Montgomery, No More Silence

"I don’t remember exactly where I found the brown paper that Oswald had wrapped the rifle in. It was probably close to 36 inches long with tape on it and no writing. I recall that it was stuffed between the boxes, not lying out open on the floor as were the shell casings. Since we were looking for the rifle, we figured that it must have been used to wrap the rifle. None of the items had been touched at that time. Marvin and I also found the sack where he’d eaten, and I believe that he drank a Dr. Pepper. We later took the bottle back to the Crime Lab to dust it for prints".



What a joke.

Oh what a tangled web we weave.

Montgomery---"we were looking for the rifle, we figured that it must have been used to wrap the rifle."

Just what Biffle said. They were standing around talking about the bag and that it held the rifle and then the rifle was found.

[Ray Mitcham]

And now from Montgomery.....the "discoverer".

Montgomery, No More Silence

"I don’t remember exactly where I found the brown paper that Oswald had wrapped the rifle in. It was probably close to 36 inches long with tape on it and no writing. I recall that it was stuffed between the boxes, not lying out open on the floor as were the shell casings. Since we were looking for the rifle, we figured that it must have been used to wrap the rifle. None of the items had been touched at that time. Marvin and I also found the sack where he’d eaten, and I believe that he drank a Dr. Pepper. We later took the bottle back to the Crime Lab to dust it for prints".



What a joke.

Oh what a tangled web we weave.

"It was probably close to 36 inches long"...... As the bag allegedly found was 48" long, it would be 12" long if it had been folded over twice,
Their stories are such a load of

[Mike Orr]

Was there a record about whose prints were found on the Dr. Pepper bottle found on the 6th floor ? If DPD examined the bottle and found prints , is there a record of the prints they found ?

[Colin Crow]

Was there a record about whose prints were found on the Dr. Pepper bottle found on the 6th floor ? If DPD examined the bottle and found prints , is there a record of the prints they found ?

Mr. McCLOY. On the crime scene, that is, on the sixth floor, did you notice any chicken bones or chicken remnants of a chicken sandwich or lunch or the whereabouts, if you did see them?
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir; there was a sack of some chicken bones and a bottle brought into the identification bureau. I think I still have that sack and bottle down there. The chicken bones, I finally threw them away that laid around there. In my talking to the men who were working on that floor, November 25, they stated, one of them stated, he had eaten lunch over there.
Mr. McCLOY. Someone other than Oswald?
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir; so I discarded it, or disconnected it with being with Oswald. Incidentally, Oswald's fingerprints were not on the bottle. I checked that.
Mr. McCLOY. They were not on the bottle?
Mr. DAY. No, sir.

So for three days the chicken lunch and Dr Pepper were thought to be crime scene "evidence", yet not sent to the FBI on the night of the assassination. All Day claims is that it was because Oswald's prints were not found on them. A lone gunman from day one it seems.

[Mike Orr]

Colin , So we don't know whose fingerprints were on the Dr. Pepper bottle , only that they were not Oswalds prints . When the so-called snipers weapon was checked for prints , there were none found and then later on , prints were found that were said to be Oswald's . Nathan Darby had a 34 point match from a latent print found on one of the cardboard boxes that comprised the TSBD " Snipers Nest " and the inked print of Malcolm Wallace . Darby's match was a blind match . Another Texas based fingerprint expert E. H. Hoffmeister , when presented with the two prints that had been given to Darby , concluded that they had been made by the same person . When he was told that the Kennedy Assassination was involved , he backed off the identification .

[Colin Crow]

From another thread.....

"For instance, it doesn't matter how many cops saw and testified under oath that there was a long bag in the sniper's nest, because there isn't a photo it seems that the long bag was never there, Colin logic!"
JohnM

Anyone wish to offer which cops testified under oath to the presence of a long bag in the corner as designated by Studebaker's exhibit?

When we establish who they were and when they arrived we might be able to apply some logic and see where it leads.