Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories  (Read 1870 times)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 5637
Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2019, 11:36:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
linguistic forensics --I went and looked that one up...

That's just a phrase that Doyle made up to try to justify his made-up crap.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2019, 11:37:24 PM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2019, 11:36:39 PM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1696
Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2019, 04:59:39 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I proposed that there was an Oswald impersonator ..not another "Oswald'' per se'. I've posted this in several other threads.
Lee Oswald's family members need not have known about the fake.Nowhere have I stated said claims. Tracy supports the official report...I urge one and all to read through my posts that demonstrate Oswald was set up.

What's the difference between "an Oswald impersonator," and "another 'Oswald' per se"?

-- MWT  :)


Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 302
Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2019, 03:14:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I proposed that there was an Oswald impersonator ..not another "Oswald'' per se'. I've posted this in several other threads.
Lee Oswald's family members need not have known about the fake.Nowhere have I stated said claims. Tracy supports the official report...I urge one and all to read through my posts that demonstrate Oswald was set up.
Again: Tracy has addressed here the claims made by Veciana. Specifically that his control officer (if there was one) was CIA officer David Atlee Phillips and that, most important, he saw Phillips with Oswald. That's the topic.

Then you criticize him - in his posts on Veciana - for not proving "the CIA" was involved, for not proving that Dulles was involved. Even though his specific topic was VECIANA and not Dulles or "the CIA."

I have no idea what your posts "demonstrating" that Oswald was set up has to do with Tracy's look into Veciana's claims.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2019, 03:14:46 PM »

Online Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1425
  • Mk 4:22
Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #33 on: May 20, 2019, 07:47:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I have no idea what your posts "demonstrating" that Oswald was set up has to do with Tracy's look into Veciana's claims.
Take a look at the title of the topic here and we will see that we are drifting away from that.
My main criticism is that independent researcher/investigators who support the official story are praised and heralded as truth bringers and setting the record straight. At best some of their ideas are inconclusive from what I see. Those who question the official story are ridiculed and looked upon as heretics or even less. There is something twisted about this. Those who do not agree demonstrate my point. I'm done with this thread and will return with more specific questions.
I started a sincere thread ..'Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza?' and see who came along and hijacked and muddled it up with silly unrelated videos  ...the usual suspects.
     You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
 

Offline W. Tracy Parnell

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #34 on: May 20, 2019, 09:21:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Take a look at the title of the topic here and we will see that we are drifting away from that.
My main criticism is that independent researcher/investigators who support the official story are praised and heralded as truth bringers and setting the record straight. At best some of their ideas are inconclusive from what I see. Those who question the official story are ridiculed and looked upon as heretics or even less. There is something twisted about this. Those who do not agree demonstrate my point. I'm done with this thread and will return with more specific questions.
I started a sincere thread ..'Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza?' and see who came along and hijacked and muddled it up with silly unrelated videos  ...the usual suspects.
     You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

It could be a case of where one is standing I guess, but I don't share your experience. For example, I read that Morley has over 2 million hits, while I have 25K. Now granted, he has more content than I do, but still...

My interest is in taking claims that are established or have not been challenged, as was the case with Veciana, and seeing what is there. When I went to the primary documents, they didn't say what Fonzi said they did. But no one had looked into it. Now, Newman is looking at it and the criticism is from both sides. H&L was a little different as there were critics on both sides right away. Anyway, I'll be happy to answer any other questions you might have.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: W. Tracy Parnell= Bungling JFK Assassination Theories
« Reply #34 on: May 20, 2019, 09:21:49 PM »

 

Mobile View