Was June Dishong "Captured" At The Left Edge Of Full-Frame Altgens-6?

[John Iacoletti]

Unlike Iacoletti, who professes to strive for establishing and defending the veracity of TRUE (i.e., "CT") FACTS and debunking evil, evil (i.e., "LN") FALLACIES, but falls short in both categories, I try to tackle misconceptions wherever I find them.

You create more than you ?tackle?.

[Thomas Graves]

You create more than you ?tackle?.

Iacoletti,

It only seems that way to you because you're either virtually blind, or have a hard time following written instructions regarding where and how to look, or you have a "Damn The Evidence -- Oswald Innocent At All Costs" agenda.

Still can't see the more-or-less-vertical, washed-out-by-sunlight areas on your "Glasses Woman's" face (her right side) and hair (in the middle) in Betzner-3?

Perfect example.

You are brilliantly stubborn to the point of scintillating obtuseness, Iacoletti.

-- MWT   

[John Iacoletti]

Iacoletti,

You don't need to put my name in every post.

It only seems that way to you because you're either virtually blind, or have a hard time following written instructions regarding where and how to look, or you have a "Damn The Evidence -- Oswald Innocent At All Costs" agenda.

Just because you think you see some kind of detail, that doesn't mean that it's obvious to everybody.

Get over it.

[Thomas Graves]

You don't need to put my name in every post.

Just because you think you see some kind of detail, that doesn't mean that it's obvious to everybody.

Iacoletti,

Have I said that the things I'm trying to point out in the photos, frames and films are "obvious"?

If so, my bad.

I should have said, "Tricky to spot in even the best copies and at ideal enlargements, but discernable."

-- MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

Iacoletti,

You don?t need to put my name in every post.

Have I said that the things I'm trying to point out in the photos, frames and films are "obvious"?

In some cases, yes.

If so, my bad.

I should have said, "Tricky to spot in even the best copies and at ideal enlargements, but discernable."

To you, maybe.

[Thomas Graves]

To you, maybe.

To JFK assassination students and "researchers" who can follow written instructions, have reasonably good eyesight, and who do not have an "Oswald-Was-Innocent!" mind-clouding bias.

-- MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

To JFK assassination students and "researchers" who can follow written instructions, have reasonably good eyesight, and who do not have an "Oswald-Was-Innocent!" mind-clouding bias.

When did I ever say Oswald was innocent, and what the hell does that have to do with your alleged ?striped skirt? on black-blob anyway?

Let?s talk about narcissistic ?researchers? who think that whatever they imagine that they ?see? is reality?