Steve M.?
Have you run away, AGAIN?
-- MWT 
I've had about a half dozen exchanges with you on this matter and at this point there's no place go to. It's just going to be a repeat of what I've said.
I've presented the evidence that Oswald went to MC. You dismiss each piece as being faked or planted or staged. You believe, for example, Marina and Ruth Paine typed the letter that Oswald sent to the Soviet Embassy. As to the signature, well you can't explain that. You think the draft copy in his handwriting is somehow faked. On and on, fake this and fake that. There is no way I can disprove these claims. In fact, every piece of evidence for me that he went is evidence for you that he didn't: because every piece for you has been manufactured to make it appear he went there. If 100 pieces of evidence is presented that he went is produced, you will view each of those 100 pieces as evidence he didn't. Up is down and down is up for you. So again, where can we take this? It's a dead end of repetition.
Your claim that Oswald was impersonated at the consulate is solely based on Azcue's and Duran's description of Oswald's heighth. You ignore Duran saying - for half a century - that it was Oswald. Your claim that he was impersonated on a phone call is that there's a memo somewhere written by someone somewhere that the caller spoke broken English. And that - and that alone - proves it was a Soviet impostor. The CIA translators - the Tarasoff couple - who say they heard/translated the calls never mention anything about the speaker having broken English. But you ignore that. The Soviet Embassy officials say the man they met over two days was Oswald. But you say they are lying because of some plan to prevent a fuller investigation by the WC because of a fear of a war. So again, their claims are, for you, faked.
Again, you seem to be incapable of disagreeing without being disagreeable. It's why no one here, frankly, exchanges posts with you after a couple of tries. You are a mirror image of DiEugenio. He sees the CIA behind everything; you see the Soviets behind everything.
The evidence that Oswald went to MC - the eyewitness accounts, the physical evidence, the photographic evidence, the circumstantial evidence - for me is substantial. I've posted most of it. You can accept it or, as is your choice, reject it all as faked. There's nothing further to discuss unless we just repeat again and again and again what we say. At this point, I choose not to.
