We need a fresh congressional inquiry into this crime

[Paul May]

No new hard nor credible evidence in 56 years.  A new investigation? Surely you jest.  In addition, the Kennedy family would never allow an exhumation of the body.  Without it, any investigation would be pointless.

[Bill Chapman]

The articles contains a number of factual inaccuracies.

"Only two people were working the south district,? Nelson said, ?my partner J.D. Tippit and me. Tippit was working the entire Oak Cliff section..""

Patently incorrect for example.

Did you research the various statements in the article Bill? You do know that Nelson was supposedly instructed to stay in Oak Cliff with Tippit by Murray Jackson. Yet he went to the TSBD instead. Wonder why.

As for Bugs "theory".....maybe looking downward and not in someone?s eye might help if they are drawing a gun.....cuts both ways I suppose.

A perp intent on shooting you is going to be on the alert for a mistake like that. In any case Colin, I'm not invested in what Nelson said other than what probably got Tippit killed.

Poor dumb cop.

[Bill Chapman]

   Chappo brought up Nelson and Nelson was full of ....
Colin calls it 'inaccuracies'.. He is too kind. I call it lies. Nelson lied about a cop telling him that he saw the gunman up in the TSBD. [See my earlier post] Such a witness would have certainly testified before the Commission and yet Nelson waits 50 years to even talk about it.  By all means do so. Because I am not restrained by the sluggish..gummed up lack of logic you apparently possess Cheers

Your own 'logic' is more than a little fuzzy in nature...

[Anthony Clayden]

The main thing that a new investigation could do is re-examine the JFK's body, to see if the any evidence of the bullet movements of the "magic" bullet and to confirm the impact location of the head shot.

Unfortunately the other things I would like to get solved will now never be solved, the people are dead or too old to be of any real assistance
Getting the full testimony of the 4 ladies on 4th floor is now too late. Garner to confirm actions of Adams and Styles and her own, Dormann to confirm movements of the other three.
Sorting out Hines and Reid failure to cross paths (one of their testimonies just doesn't fit the other).

[Jerry Freeman]

Your own 'logic' is more than a little fuzzy in nature...

Sez U. Your logic is nonexistent Ole Chap.
Chapman doesn't see anything odd about Tippit's dedicated buddy and partner not being subject to discussion or interview or being called to testify what was up with him on that particular day.

[Paul May]

The main thing that a new investigation could do is re-examine the JFK's body, to see if the any evidence of the bullet movements of the "magic" bullet and to confirm the impact location of the head shot.

Unfortunately the other things I would like to get solved will now never be solved, the people are dead or too old to be of any real assistance
Getting the full testimony of the 4 ladies on 4th floor is now too late. Garner to confirm actions of Adams and Styles and her own, Dormann to confirm movements of the other three.
Sorting out Hines and Reid failure to cross paths (one of their testimonies just doesn't fit the other).

Wrong. A new investigation could not exhume JFK?s body.  Only the Kennedy family could authorize that and it will never happen.  Ever.

[Bill Chapman]

Sez U. Your logic is nonexistent Ole Chap.
Chapman doesn't see anything odd about Tippit's dedicated buddy and partner not being subject to discussion or interview or being called to testify what was up with him on that particular day.

You lot see malevolence and sinister intent at every turn.

In this particular case, I have proven that 'poor dumb cop' is not a vacuous reference, as charged against myself by John Iacoletti. However, Tippit has likely proven the term applicable. It seems to me that?based on information supplied by Nelson about Tippit's somewhat odd behaviour? that indeed Oswald did in fact base his comment (heard by a witness) on that very behaviour.

Poor dumb cop.