How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

[Jerry Freeman]

Additionally ....Frazier [in his interviews] states that Oswald was calm and appeared not to be nervous when he saw him after the shooting.
This agrees with the cab driver in his statement concerning his passenger [be it Oswald or not]
In their zeal to hang it on Lee, the cops found a willing Bledsoe who expressed an apparent distaste for him. A calm Oswald was not suspicious enough. So what then if he did hop a bus?...it doesn't prove that Oswald shot JFK.

Buell said Oswald came out about 5-10 minutes after the shooting

Yeah out the back door. The Report said 3 minutes out the front door. Every minute counted in order to get Oswald over in time to shoot that cop.

[Martin Weidmann]

The bag contained Oswald's prints and a fiber that matched Oswald's blanket, the same blanket that was empty on the floor of the Paine garage.



JohnM

a fiber that matched Oswald's blanket


You keep claiming this, but show us where an expert actually used the word "matched"?

[Richard Smith]

Smith keeps claiming that I am putting forth a theory, "a fantasy theory" to boot, when I am actually pointing out what the  evidence actually shows. Why does he keep ignoring the actual evidence?

Why does he support theories with NO supporting evidence? You'll notice that he hasn't cited one piece of evidence in all his replies.

Translation:  although Rob has repeatedly claimed that Oswald was not on the bus and any evidence of such is the product of fakery or lies, he cannot come up with any explanation whatsoever for why his conspirators would fake Oswald's appearance on a bus that takes him nowhere.  If the purpose of Oswald's "fake" bus ride was to cover up for getting a ride from someone else, it does not do that because the bus takes him nowhere and the cab ride would suffice for that purpose.  There is no rational explanation in a conspiracy scenario for placing Oswald both on this bus and a cab, necessitating that a random group of bus passengers be convinced not to say otherwise, when the cab ride alone would have served that purpose.  Thus, the bus ride makes no sense as part of any fabricated event. 

[Bill Chapman]

a fiber that matched Oswald's blanket


You keep claiming this, but show us where an expert actually used the word "matched"?

Stombaugh

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/stombaugh.htm

[Martin Weidmann]

Stombaugh

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/stombaugh.htm

You mean this?

Mr. EISENBERG. Now you also said there were several fibers, Mr. Stombaugh?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes, sir; I did. There was a single brown delustered viscose fiber and several light-green cotton fibers.
Mr. EISENBERG. Did this single brown viscose fiber match the fibers from the blanket, Exhibit 140?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes; it did.
Mr. EISENBERG. In what characteristics were they matched?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. The fibers in the blanket had a large number of brown viscose fibers, delustered and one fiber I found in the bag was also a viscose fiber of the same type and color as seen under a low-powered microscope. The delustering spots seen on the fiber were the same size, and both fibers were approximately the same diameter.
Mr. EISENBERG. How common is viscose, Mr. Stombaugh, as a fiber?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Viscose is fairly common. It is used in many types of garments; it depends on the quality of the garment.
Mr. EISENBERG. And this was delustered viscose, did you say?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes.
Mr. EISENBERG. How common is delustered viscose?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. It is most common, I would say. It is more common than lustrous.

[Jerry Freeman]

  Chapman and Mytton must be joined at the hip. They seem to spontaneously respond to each others questions
 I reviewed that testimony also. Stombough mentions the word 'match' some 67 times relating to Oswald's body hairs found on the blanket [like it was never cleaned?]
  There you have it...absolute proof! Of what really? Ehhh not so sure there.
 
 

[Rob Caprio]

Translation:  although Rob has repeatedly claimed that Oswald was not on the bus and any evidence of such is the product of fakery or lies, he cannot come up with any explanation whatsoever for why his conspirators would fake Oswald's appearance on a bus that takes him nowhere.  If the purpose of Oswald's "fake" bus ride was to cover up for getting a ride from someone else, it does not do that because the bus takes him nowhere and the cab ride would suffice for that purpose.  There is no rational explanation in a conspiracy scenario for placing Oswald both on this bus and a cab, necessitating that a random group of bus passengers be convinced not to say otherwise, when the cab ride alone would have served that purpose.  Thus, the bus ride makes no sense as part of any fabricated event.

Translation: Richard still can't support the WC's claim so he tries to shift the burden onto me. Typical. Why does he support a theory that seems to be indefensible?