Why would the conspirators let Oswald have a midnight press conference?

[Steve Howsley]

Why do you think your fantasy conspirators would want to keep Oswald from the press?  Gee, he might say he didn't kill anybody.  That would ruin everything.

That would ruin everything?

LOL

[John Mytton]

When did Rob (or anyone else) claim that?

Ok so you reckon that nobody claimed any of the main evidence was planted against Oswald, ok!

JohnM

[Howard Gee]

Why do you think your fantasy conspirators would want to keep Oswald from the press?  Gee, he might say he didn't kill anybody.  That would ruin everything.

Wait a minute.

I thought it was the CKs and the Saint patsy defense team that insist on the existence of conspirators.

Nice of you to acknowledge it's only a fantasy.

Try to get right whose fantasy it is.

[Jon Banks]

They are not my conspirators?.but your pathetic assumption that conspirators in general would ever be able to control every minor detail of an event and all the people involved is wacky to say the least.

Conspirators after the fact controlling the physical evidence, now that's a different ballgame all together.

But back to my question; what makes you think the people who arranged the press conferences were part of the conspiracy if there was one?

Conspirators never make mistakes.

That?s why no Conspiracy in the history of mankind has ever been exposed 

[Martin Weidmann]

Wait a minute.

I thought it was the CKs and the Saint patsy defense team that insist on the existence of conspirators.

Nice of you to acknowledge it's only a fantasy.

Try to get right whose fantasy it is.

How does the CT general belief of the existence of conspirators equate to LNs making up bogus stories about particular persons who they claim were, could or would have been, part of a conspiracy?

[Howard Gee]

How does the CT general belief of the existence of conspirators equate to LNs making up bogus stories about particular persons who they claim were, could or would have been, part of a conspiracy?

I didn't realize it was the LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators.

I thought that was the domain of the CKs.

And here I was thinking that the term 'lone nut' was indicative of Oswald acting alone, that there was no conspiracy and no conpirators to name.

Now I understand that it's actually the LNs naming bogus conspirators.

Thanks for clarifying that, Marty.

[Martin Weidmann]

I didn't realize it was the LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators.

I thought that was the domain of the CKs.

And here I was thinking that the term 'lone nut' was indicative of Oswald acting alone, that there was no conspiracy and no conpirators to name.

Now I understand that it's actually the LNs naming bogus conspirators.

Thanks for clarifying that, Marty.

Now I understand that it's actually the LNs naming bogus conspirators.


Too bad but not a real surprise that you didn't get it.

Perhaps it goes along with the alternate reality LNs prefer to live in.