Why would the conspirators let Oswald have a midnight press conference?

[Howard Gee]

Now I understand that it's actually the LNs naming bogus conspirators.


Too bad but not a real surprise that you didn't get it.

Perhaps it goes along with the alternate reality LNs prefer to live in.

I get it now.

That's why I thanked you for explaining that it's the LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators.

I was under the false impression that by definition LNs don't believe there was a conspiracy, hence there are no conspirators to name.

Now that I understand that it's the LNs that are making up bogus stories about conspirators, I feel much better.

Thanks for liberating me from the alternate reality I was living in.

[Rob Caprio]

Congratulations, thanks for proving my point that even though you claim that the Dallas Police setup Oswald by replacing the Mauser, forged Oswald's palmprint, planted bullets, planted shells, planted a jacket, planted a revolver and host of other nefarious nastiness and then the Dallas Police who had full control of Oswald just let him speak freely and in turn leave themselves at the mercy of Oswald's mouth?

As if!

The only reason they let Oswald speak is because nobody cared what Oswald said because Oswald had nothing to say.

JohnM

Either you quote me saying those things in bold or we all will see that you lie and just make things up to smear other posters. Well?

[Rob Caprio]

Hardly, the DP letting Oswald speak to the press can only lead to the Dallas Police having nothing to hide.

JohnM

Only in your opinion. Since you weren't there you have no way of knowing for sure why they did this.

[Rob Caprio]

Ok so you reckon that nobody claimed any of the main evidence was planted against Oswald, ok!

JohnM

But you claimed that I did. Thanks for proving that you lied in an attempt to smear me when I treated you civilly.

[Martin Weidmann]

I get it now.

That's why I thanked you for explaining that it's the LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators.

I was under the false impression that by definition LNs don't believe there was a conspiracy, hence there are no conspirators to name.

Now that I understand that it's the LNs that are making up bogus stories about conspirators, I feel much better.

Thanks for liberating me from the alternate reality I was living in.

You are making progress?.

At least now you understand that there is a difference between

"LNs naming bogus conspirators"

and

"LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators

Well done 

[Howard Gee]

You are making progress?.

At least now you understand that there is a difference between

"LNs naming bogus conspirators"

and

"LNs making up bogus stories about conspirators

Well done 

That's great, Marty.

Now that you've explained the difference, feel free to cite any LNer naming bogus conspirators and/or making up bogus stories about them.

Name a conspirator or bogus story about a conspirator that LNers have brought forth or endorsed.

Better yet, name a LNer that believes there was a conspiracy or conspirators to begin with.

LNers continually debunk the naming of the fantasy conspirators and the bogus stories and theories that the CKs keep bringing.

Talk about alternate realties. What color is the sky on your planet ?

[John Mytton]

JohnM: Hardly, the DP letting Oswald speak to the press can only lead to the Dallas Police having nothing to hide.

That's quite a glaring non-sequitur.  Even for you.

The Dallas police collected all the first day evidence any of which if fake or planted could perhaps be contradicted by Oswald, why take that chance?, therefore as I said earlier the actions of the Dallas Police can only lead to them having nothing to hide.

JohnM