Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy  (Read 23813 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #56 on: August 05, 2018, 06:19:08 AM »
Advertisement
My shots?... *::) ............In that clip had the last shot been fired? Anyway read that affidavit... Where it says above and behind.

 *Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.

Quote
In that clip had the last shot been fired?

Seriously, you don't know?

Quote
Anyway read that affidavit... Where it says above and behind.

Yeah above and behind the Limo.

Mr. LIEBELER - Did you have any idea that they might have come from the Texas School Book Depository Building?
Mr. HUDSON - Well, it sounded like it was high, you know, from above and kind of behind like - in other words, to the left.
Mr. LIEBELER - And that would have fit in with the Texas School Book Depository, wouldn't it?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes.


Quote
*Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.

That's rich coming from the guy who repeatedly demonstrates that his limited research comes from Youtube and comic books

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #56 on: August 05, 2018, 06:19:08 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #57 on: August 05, 2018, 02:24:04 PM »
Yeah above and behind the Limo.
NO NO NO
From the affidavit....read something for a change-----the affidavit states--
 Hudson said "the shots [plural] definitely came from behind and above" WHO? ---him--"Definitely" --that means positively for sure.

 For all to see---

 

 
Quote
Seriously, you don't know?
Seriously, you don't know.
Liebeler [which sounds like a good name for this guy] was overtly telling Hudson what to say at his own testimony..
Quote
Mr. LIEBELER - You say that it was the second shot that hit him in the head; is that right?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes; I do believe that - I know it was.
Mr. LIEBELER - You heard it come from sort of behind the motorcade and then above?
Mr. LIEBELER - And if we assume that he was shot twice, you would have to say that he was hit by the third shot; isn't that right?
Read this testimony and you will not believe how many times Leibeler asks the same question over and over until he Wesley Leibeler provides the answers he wants----
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hudson.htm
Hudson said he hit the ground laying down [not shown in the clip]
 

You can't argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and then slime you with experience.

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2621
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #58 on: August 05, 2018, 03:54:10 PM »
Give it a rest Storing, here is Marilyn Sitzman telling us with her own words that what she saw was exactly what we see in the Zapruder Film.


JohnM

          Yeah. "Give it a rest" = your waving a White Flag. Not happening until you Stop proffering contrived BS cartoon visual aids & trash guys like Tink Thompson. Just as Paul Newman told Richard Boone in "Hombre" as Boone approached him with a White Flag in hand, " I got 1 question. How you gonna get down that hill?"

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #58 on: August 05, 2018, 03:54:10 PM »


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #59 on: August 05, 2018, 07:02:49 PM »
NO NO NO
From the affidavit....read something for a change-----the affidavit states--
 Hudson said "the shots [plural] definitely came from behind and above" WHO? ---him--"Definitely" --that means positively for sure.

 For all to see---

 

  Seriously, you don't know.
Liebeler [which sounds like a good name for this guy] was overtly telling Hudson what to say at his own testimony..Read this testimony and you will not believe how many times Leibeler asks the same question over and over until he Wesley Leibeler provides the answers he wants----
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hudson.htm
Hudson said he hit the ground laying down [not shown in the clip]
 

You can't argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and then slime you with experience.

Yes... Excellent post and highlights Hudson's testimony that the shot came from above and behind him... and the fact that Leibeler was leading the witness wanting to get to the answer he was fishing for... That should be obvious to every junior lawyer...

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #60 on: August 05, 2018, 09:22:13 PM »
That should be obvious to every junior lawyer...
It should be obvious to a goldfish.
 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #60 on: August 05, 2018, 09:22:13 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #61 on: August 06, 2018, 03:26:29 AM »
NO NO NO
From the affidavit....read something for a change-----the affidavit states--
 Hudson said "the shots [plural] definitely came from behind and above" WHO? ---him--"Definitely" --that means positively for sure.

 For all to see---

 

  Seriously, you don't know.
Liebeler [which sounds like a good name for this guy] was overtly telling Hudson what to say at his own testimony..Read this testimony and you will not believe how many times Leibeler asks the same question over and over until he Wesley Leibeler provides the answers he wants----
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hudson.htm
Hudson said he hit the ground laying down [not shown in the clip]
 

You can't argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and then slime you with experience.


Quote
NO NO NO
From the affidavit....read something for a change-----the affidavit states--
 Hudson said "the shots [plural] definitely came from behind and above" WHO? ---him--"Definitely" --that means positively for sure.

As you helpfully point out Hudson says "the shots [plural]" and it seems that Hudson never mentions crossfire and is saying that all three shots came from only one direction so please explain if the three shots came from the front then how were Kennedy and Connally both shot in the back? Magic bullets? Hahaha!

JohnM

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #62 on: August 06, 2018, 05:57:22 AM »
Hudson is the man in the center and if shots were fired from directly behind him he's showing very little reaction and in fact the man on the end is turning and running back towards your shots?



Agreed, Marilyn Sitzman is a terrific eyewitness and fully describes the damage as seen in the Zapruder Film, Autopsy photos, X Rays and in the Official Autopsy Report.



JohnM

      If Emmett Joseph Hudson was the "middle man" on the steps, he certainly wasn't sitting down as per his voluntary statement.  He mentions a man on his left but fails to mention the man in the red shirt in front of him.   It certainly looks like the man in the red shirt is pointing something and when the right hand is fully extended, the man on the left of Hudson decides to dart away.  The man in the red shirt also looks like he is doing a "timing/dancing" move to follow the car up and line himself up for a shot.  On the original Muchmore Film, it appears that there is a white muzzle flash near the end of his extended arm just at the very instant the President's head disappears behind the motorcycle cop's helmet which corresponds again to Z330/Z331.  Timing done by looking at Jacqueline's arm coming around the President's head at Z325 or thereabouts.
      I would have to assume that the other 2 standing with Hudson disappeared into the great abyss without so much as an interview.  It also appears that the man in the red shirt (below) wears a watch on his left wrist which catches the light when he makes his move.   The move this man makes is bizarre and certainly would need explanation from him in my opinion!    This move certainly makes the man on the left of Hudson want to get out rather quickly after the red shirted man extends his right arm or it could have been pure coincidental with the scene.   On the other hand, Emmet stands there motionless and emotionless - no reaction whatsoever.    However, he claims he was sitting on the steps and only mentions the man on the left in his voluntary statement and no mention of the red shirted man - statement therefore appears contradictory to the video entirely or subduing the elimination of the third witness entirely!
      There is an instant where we see a similar move as the President's head comes out from behind the sign after the first shot occurred.   This person goes from a full arm extension to one of putting that hand behind the back.  Again, impossible to see identity of person or see exactly how many where standing there and why that move was exhibited as well as it certainly coincided at a critical time to the passing of the motorcade and the timing of the shots with the POTUS reaction in grabbing his neck with the umbrella man and the Cuban waving at him from the front of the road sign.
https://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z218.jpg

https://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z238.jpg

« Last Edit: August 06, 2018, 06:14:56 AM by Allan Fritzke »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #62 on: August 06, 2018, 05:57:22 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #63 on: August 06, 2018, 11:36:32 PM »
Sitzman never said that she was pointing at the exact spot where she saw his head open up.  And Mytton's screenshot of her hand which was in motion happening to be in a spot that he likes is just as dishonest as the time he did that with Dr. Paul Peters.