JFK Assassination Forum

  Say what? The Dem's are now claiming that the 2024 POTUS Election was rigged.

Examples?


I'm not at all arguing that Democrats don't engage in conspiracy theories. I believe "Russiagate" counts as a conspiracy theory that many Democrats subscribe to.


But I haven't heard any prominent Democrats claim that the 2024 election was "rigged".

  Say what? The Dem's are now claiming that the 2024 POTUS Election was rigged. The Dem's have absolutely Nothing going for them. They're so bankrupt in the area of ideas that they are Now repeating Trump claims. The "conspiracy" claims are now the property of the Dem Party. Lock/Stock/Barrel

My two-cents:

- Most of the first generation Warren Commission critics were Leftists. In fact, the term "Deep State" and other broad criticisms of the US national security state were predominantly used by Leftwingers prior to Donald Trump's emergence in American national politics.

- You seem to ignore or downplay how conspiracy theories in general have become more common among Rightwingers today. Q-Anon, Pizzagate, Jewish Space Lasers, The Great Replacement theory, Obama was born in Kenya, etc are all theories that gained popularity on the Right over the past 5-10 years. So let's not pretend that conspiracy theories are exclusively a Leftwing problem.

- Prior to Trump's emergence on the political scene, the JFK assassination CT community was mostly non-partisan. Sadly, that has begun to change as Democrats now generally defend the national security state as part of their opposition to Trump while Republicans more commonly criticize the FBI and CIA due to the handling of "Russiagate" and other national security scandals involving Trump.

- I have long been aware of your conservative political views but still read your essays and respected your research on the Kennedy assassination in spite of our political differences.

- Are you disappointed in the way Trump has handled the Epstein stuff?

Again, I answered you and Organ on this issue. Your whole argument boils down to claiming that the difference in camera angles explains the serious and readily apparent conflict between Jackie's position in relation Hill in Z375/380 and her position in the corresponding Nix frame. IOW, you're saying this serious conflict is really just a remarkable optical illusion caused by the difference in the camera angles. And I say that this argument is invalid, that the camera angles are not different enough to explain the obvious conflict between Z375/380 and the Nix frame.

Griffith,

Please remind me.

How many bad guys and bad gals do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the getting-away, the film-and x-ray-altering, and the all-important (and continuing!!!) cover up?

Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

Which is more plausible?

That a former Marine sharpshooter with a "clunky"-but-accurate bolt-action rifle at the TSBD's sixth-floor south-east-corner window killed JFK by hitting him with two shots fired about five seconds apart at 80 and 90 yards, respectively, while JFK was moving slowly and almost directly away down a slight grade in an open convertible

--OR--

That Oswald was just a "patsy," and there were actually TWO shooters, one of whom fired from the above-described "Sniper's Nest" (or from a building behind the TSBD to make it look as though he had), and that they and oodles and gobs of their co-conspirators framed the former Marine sharpshooter by planting false evidence against him and have succeeded in covering up their participation in the assassination to this day?

It must have been the latter, right?

LOL!