Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
You weren't clear about anything except you want to pretend Knotts Lab's obvious failure is somehow connected to Dale Myers's animation.

"This all seems like an opportunity missed. The model of Dealey Plaza and the limo seem great but when it comes to the most important aspect of this model - the occupants of the limo - it's like they got a 5 year old to do that bit. Everything that can be wrong about them is wrong - wrong size, wrong position, wrong relative positions. In comparison to the rest of the model, the occupants seem really crudely done. I don't understand why this is.

I can't find a critique of the Knott reconstruction anywhere. I know nothing about computer graphics but I can plainly see there is so much wrong here.

As for Royell...who knows.
He cannot stop going on about the Knott Lab reconstruction but ask him a question about it and he disappears."



Can you point out in this post by Dan where he is asking you to bawl, whine and snivel about the animation of Dale Myers.

He does ask you to explain Knotts Lab’s animation, which you are obviously avoiding.

You know the animation depicting JBC having been struck in the back by the same bullet that struck JFK, all the while erroneously insisting that SBT is somehow false.

i have never been one to bawl , while and snivel , i leave such things to LN such as yourself .and after all as we can see here in that respect you have achieved success , so congratulations .

and once again i can only suggest that you do that which you clearly did not do and READ what i actually said . or do not , the choice is yours , either way it makes no difference to me . have a good day bawling and snivelling .
2
considering that LN such as your self post on most threads here i decided to try to make my comments as simplified as possible ,so that even you could grasp it . it seems i over estimated your level of intellect . feel free to tell me how i can simply it even more and bring it down to such a level so that even you can finally grasp what is being said . i am nothing if not helpful , but some times i am a tad forgetful and i do forget that the IQ of the average LN is shall we say lacking . but do not worry , i am happy to be of assistance to you , tell me what part is too complicated for you and i will try to bring it down to a level that even you can understand .
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 04:48:57 AM »
  My pleasure, Charles.  I'm you are able to see the "hunching" of the shoulders.  It was David Von Pein  who first pointed this out, although I didn't know that he had until after I saw it, and I started a thread in a JFK group and included this gif a long while back, and he posted a note informing us that he had found this himself, and had also posted a gif of it. 
I agree with you all the way that this is further proof of both men reacting simutaneously by the same bullet.  Thanks so much!
I don’t dispute that they are reacting at the same time to the same shot. I just disagree that the evidence supports it being the second shot.
4
i think you need to do what you seem to have not done and actually read what i posted , i made ZERO claims regarding the Knotts lab animation . but i was quite clear in what i said and in the point i was making . enough said .

You weren't clear about anything except you want to pretend Knotts Lab's obvious failure is somehow connected to Dale Myers's animation.

"This all seems like an opportunity missed. The model of Dealey Plaza and the limo seem great but when it comes to the most important aspect of this model - the occupants of the limo - it's like they got a 5 year old to do that bit. Everything that can be wrong about them is wrong - wrong size, wrong position, wrong relative positions. In comparison to the rest of the model, the occupants seem really crudely done. I don't understand why this is.

I can't find a critique of the Knott reconstruction anywhere. I know nothing about computer graphics but I can plainly see there is so much wrong here.

As for Royell...who knows.
He cannot stop going on about the Knott Lab reconstruction but ask him a question about it and he disappears."



Can you point out in this post by Dan where he is asking you to bawl, whine and snivel about the animation of Dale Myers.

He does ask you to explain Knotts Lab’s animation, which you are obviously avoiding.

You know the animation depicting JBC having been struck in the back by the same bullet that struck JFK, all the while erroneously insisting that SBT is somehow false.
5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Steve Barber on Today at 12:25:14 AM »

Thanks Steve, that’s a very clear sequence of frames and it shows the double shoulder movement as you describe. It also shows JFK’s concurrent reactions, JBC’s jacket front flipping out, and JBC’s right hand and arm moving rapidly upwards. All of this happens in a small fraction of a second. It sure looks to me like this is where both JFK and JBC were struck with CE 399.

  My pleasure, Charles.  I'm you are able to see the "hunching" of the shoulders.  It was David Von Pein  who first pointed this out, although I didn't know that he had until after I saw it, and I started a thread in a JFK group and included this gif a long while back, and he posted a note informing us that he had found this himself, and had also posted a gif of it. 
I agree with you all the way that this is further proof of both men reacting simutaneously by the same bullet.  Thanks so much!
6
   Do you know the DATE the "aerial" you are using was taken? As I said previously, I have seen footage of a TARP/TENT stretching from that "south edge" ALL the way back near the Shelter. It's possible there were alterations made within this area after the assassination and completed before this "aerial" was taken.  Do we know for a Fact that the retaining wall "south edge" which extended toward The Steps, ran perpendicular/right angle to the longer section of retaining wall? Is it possible that this "south edge" extension Angled away from the longer section of that wall? Generally mirroring a wedge/pie slice.

Here's the Phase II Map without any alteration by me.



The greyed areas were walkway alterations, some for accessibility, some to replace decayed slabs. That might be the reason for the tarp and construction beside the Pergola. There were no plans, that I can see, to alter the retaining wall itself, or the stairs leading up to it. The renovations proposed in Phase II were completed a few months before the 50th anniversary.



The new concrete behind the retaining wall appears to reach the topmost of the original steps, which are preserved save for hand-railings. You can use Google Earth to get a good sense as to how square the space is that's between the retaining wall and S-N fence portion.
7
and you would not be at all biased MR MAY ?  , i think we both know differently dont we ? . i am quite long in the tooth in terms of studying this case and reading JFK threads on such forums as this  . and as such you are no stranger to me . as we might say where i come from I KNOW YOU OF OLD . i am not trying to BS you so if you wouldnt mind please dont try to BS me . but thank you for your reply , it is nothing less than i might expect from one such as you .

Another unsociable, hairbrained response.
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Jerry Organ on May 03, 2024, 08:13:10 PM »
No.  It is about what you need to do in order to justify calling it "bats_it crazy". (I would write it out in full but it comes out as batspombleprofglidnoctobuns).
 A sight line is a sightline.  The zoom lens changes perspective but not sightlines.  Changing focal length does not unblock parts that were previously blocked.

In your zoom "correction" you have JFK too far to the right.   



That's where you have Kennedy and where he ends up with the proper perspective and line-of-sight. I discovered you had Kennedy pressed about six inches into the seat-back. So the President, per your Theory, is too far back, not too far to his right.

Quote
In z193 the sightline from Zapruder blocks up to the right edge of the left trunk hand-hold:



I have more confidence where the back tire and door seams are in that view than where I used to place the hand-grips. I've since slightly shifted the hand-grip location a few times, based on better information and photos. Without my own direct measurements (or someone who takes measurements and documents exactly where they start from and go to), I can't vouch for it.



Here's where your back tire and door leave Kennedy.

Quote
Yes.  You might use this as a guide:


Right. So we know how that person on that particular day had his knees high up, as least the moment the photo was taken. That has no more to do with how Connally's knees might have been than the man in the back seat has to do with how JFK sat. What if the door was closed and leaning one legs against it was helpful.



This photograph shows Kennedy with both knees together and against the car interior. By your definition, the President is a eunuch. There is no sign that Connally's thighs are sharply angled up.

I'm going to amend my model of your Theory with some or all of this:
  • Distance between JFK's exit wound and JBC's spine about 30-32 inches.
  • Connally a bit lower
  • Connally's head aligned with the side window, while being over as far as possible to the side of the car
  • Connally's torso twisted
  • Raise up Connally's left knee
  • Slope of 21 degrees relative to the car
I won't make Connally's head disturbingly smaller.
9
The proof is your whole nonsense.

Everything he writes and the way he writes is nonsense. Thumb1:
10
What language is this now, gibberish?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10