Recent Posts

Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 10:47:53 PMIf there was even a hint that Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes, the Dems would have run to the media.  The Epstein problem is bipartisan. It's not as if there aren't a bunch of pictures of Bill and Hillary with Epstein and Maxwell. Other Dems, wealthy Liberals, and foreign heads of state from allied countries like Israel and the UK are mixed up with this stuff too. So it's possible that Dem elites want to sweep the Epstein stuff under the rug as much as Trump. Nevermind the fact that the DOJ and FBI don't typically just leak classified and court documents and videos to the Press. Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 10:47:53 PMThey illegally leaked his taxes and indicted him for ridiculous crimes. That wasn't a "leak". Someone who had access to Trump's tax returns gave them to the Press. Maybe a disgruntled Trump accountant for all we know.

Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 10:44:27 PMDo you really think the Dems were in power for four long years under Old Joe and they wouldn't have leaked anything about Trump being involved?  HA HA HA.  No one bought into PizzaGate except a handful of nuts that were amplified by the leftist media who wanted to make it seem as though the 70 plus million Americans who voted for Trump were all nuts.   The vast majority of MAGA person is for releasing the files that the Dems hide for four years.   The "Tiffany Doe affidavit" is enough to open further investigations.No worries - I expect the files to be scrubbed of the 'Orange Stain' then used as a weapon against others.Donald Trump | NY Magazine 2002 “I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Quote from: Jon Banks on Today at 08:49:23 PMYou frequently espouse conspiracy theories about KGB agents under every American's bed and yet, you have the audacity to accuse others of being rabid CT'ers? Righty-Lefty Banksky,Are you old enough to remember KGB* agents Anna Chapman and the Twelve Dwarfs, whom the FBI finally rolled up in 2010 after they'd been in the U.S. and Canada for ten years?How about Igor Danchenko, the guy who fed gullible Christopher Steele both false and unfalsifiable "intel" for his dossier on The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx"), and whom the FBI was investigating as a possible KGB agent until he temporarily disappeared in 2011?I could go on and on, but for now why don't you learn something for a change and google my Wikipedia article on Tennent H. Bagley and read at least some of my 350+ free articles on "How the KGB Zombified the CIA and the FBI" on Substack?*Today's SVR and FSB

Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 10:44:27 PMDo you really think the Dems were in power for four long years under Old Joe and they wouldn't have leaked anything about Trump being involved?  HA HA HA.  No one bought into PizzaGate except a handful of nuts that were amplified by the leftist media who wanted to make it seem as though the 70 plus million Americans who voted for Trump were all nuts.   The vast majority of MAGA person is for releasing the files that the Dems hide for four years. Smith,Nice spin job!"Former" KGB officer Vladimir Putin really appreciates what you do!Regardless, the Democrats didn't leak anything about Trump's being involved in what? Hyping Pizzagate's successor, QAnon, for Mike Flynn and/or Flynn's December 2015 RT dinner-partner, Vladimir Putin?Why "leak" it when it's so obvious?HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Quote from: Jon Banks on Today at 04:05:34 PMOn Epstein, there are multiple layers of scandals/crimes at play. It's really not clear where the focus should be: A - Trump's relationship with Epstein and the question of whether Trump is implicated in any of Epstein's crimes. B - Epstein's alleged sex trafficking operation which involved Ghislaine Maxwell. It had to involve more than just those two people. Will others who helped them be held accountable? C - Did Epstein really kill himself? If he was murdered, who had him killed? And who is to blame for the coverup? D - Was Epstein working as a spy other sort of asset for one or more intelligence services? My guess is that Trump is most concerned about "A" and that explains why he's behaving like someone who has something to hide.If there was even a hint that Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes, the Dems would have run to the media.  They illegally leaked his taxes and indicted him for ridiculous crimes.  If there is one thing that is certain, Trump himself is not incriminated.  Are there people Trump is trying to protect.  Maybe.  I also think Epstein killed himself.  There is no evidence that anyone else did so.

Quote from: Jake Maxwell on Today at 09:17:48 PM[...]Dear Jake,I hope you don't mind my changing your nickname from "Eagle Eye" to "Mister Magoo."-- Tom

Quote from: Tom Graves on July 17, 2025, 05:58:48 PMStoring,Isn't it likely that the reason the perverted Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with Xxxx) refuses to release the files is because he and / or some of his big donors are on tape raping some really young girls? You bought into PizzaGate, Michael Flynn's allegations that John Podesta drank the blood of sacrificial victims in Satanic rituals, and QAnon, didn't you? The "non-existent, but created-by-Clinton/Obama/Biden" Epstein files are right down your alley, dude!RELEASE THE FILES! RELEASE THE FILES! RELEASE THE FILES!Do you really think the Dems were in power for four long years under Old Joe and they wouldn't have leaked anything about Trump being involved?  HA HA HA.  No one bought into PizzaGate except a handful of nuts that were amplified by the leftist media who wanted to make it seem as though the 70 plus million Americans who voted for Trump were all nuts.   The vast majority of MAGA person is for releasing the files that the Dems hide for four years. 

It's interesting to note that the one person, perhaps closest to the event, did not believe in the SBT... Here's a summary from Google:John Connally did not believe the magic bullet theory, also known as the single-bullet theory, was accurate. He and his wife, Nellie, consistently stated that he was struck by a separate bullet after President Kennedy was hit. Furthermore, the [some] physicians who treated Connally's wounds also did not believe they were caused by the same bullet that injured Kennedy, according to The New York Times. The single-bullet theory, a key component of the Warren Commission's findings, proposed that one bullet caused multiple non-fatal wounds to both President Kennedy and Governor Connally. The Commission acknowledged a difference of opinion on this theory among its members, according to Wikipedia.... Connally's rejection of the theory is significant because it undermines the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. The timing of the shots, as determined by the Zapruder film, is crucial to the theory. If Connally was hit by a separate bullet, it would have been impossible for Oswald to have fired all the shots from his rifle within the time frame estimated by the commission.

Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on Today at 08:13:01 PMAgain, Carlos Bringuier, still alive, said he acted on his own. He insists that he never received directions from nor even knew Joannides. How does Morley surmount this? Ignoring it? Calling Bringuier a liar?The other DRE delegates - Quiroga for example - never mentioned being directed by anyone. Quiroga says Bringuier sent him to talk to Oswald. Bill Stuckey, the reporter, said he acted on his own. He went to interview Oswald for his show, found him articulate, and decided to do just that. Ed Butler, the host of the radio show that held the debate, said he contacted a source in HUAC in Washington for information on Oswald. Nothing about a CIA contact.Where's the evidence for this "operation"? This hidden hand? To be sure, they ganged up on Oswald, ambushed him. But the evidence is they did their own work, it wasn't guided by anyone. This is what they did, who they were. There's no need to direct them, they weren't pawns. Who is impugning the integrity of witnesses? Sure seems to me that Morley is the one implicitly saying that the stories told by Bringuier, Stucky and Butler were all lies, covering up for their direction by Joannides. And after Musk and DOGE cut the CIA funding I have to do this all for free now. I do accept Paypal if you want to help a useful idiot out.Morley has never implied that Oswald was the center or focus of the DRE's operation. He has never argued that Joannides or anyone else associated with the DRE was directly connected to Oswald or ordered to engage with Oswald. Do you guys ever address the things Morley has actually said?

Quote from: Tom Graves on Today at 08:11:45 PMGriffith,Are you pro-Trump?If so, it would go a long way in explaining what a rabid conspiracy theorist you are.You frequently espouse conspiracy theories about KGB agents under every American's bed and yet, you have the audacity to accuse others of being rabid CT'ers?