JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Triple Overpass Again
Gary Craig:
Steve Logan:
Good to see Psilocybin is making a comeback.
Jerry Freeman:
Someone must have watched a different film than the one I saw.
Bruce Backlund:
--- Quote from: Zeon Mason on July 03, 2018, 02:55:37 PM ---Imo, if there was a shot from the Grassy Knoll, it was purposely a blank with smoke effect to draw attention away from the expert shooter at the SW window 6th floor TSBD and a 2nd shooter Daltex bldg. This GK shooter may have sat on the hood of the car where muddy footprints were
found including on the rear bumper of the car. There may have been one other man, whom was with him. These 2 were probably the 2 men whom Lee Bowers saw, from the railyard tower behind the GK fence.
If it was a diversion shot, from GK, then it worked, since police and crowd ran to the GK. Only 2 DPD seem to have reacted differently, Baker and Barnett. Baker, who saw pigeons fly from the rooftop of TSBD and headed that way, rushing to the front entrance, and Barnett running to the side to observe the fire escape and also the back of TSBD. Barnett however failed to secure the WEST side of TSBD for up to 3 minutes.
--- End quote ---
Zeon,
Interesting theory of a blank being fired and witnesses on the underpass seeing smoke. Would also fit with the acoustical evidence being a sub-sonic shot, (pistol) that missed. I always believed Holland's statements in regards to the puff of smoke. Yes, a diversion, but no actual shooter? Possible. Something out of the ordinary happened where the two men were standing behind the fence. Perhaps even a simple firecracker, ignited behind the fence with a cigarette and it's flash caught the eye of the man in the RR switching tower.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Bruce Backlund on July 07, 2018, 02:24:49 AM ---Zeon,
Interesting theory of a blank being fired and witnesses on the underpass seeing smoke. Would also fit with the acoustical evidence being a sub-sonic shot, (pistol) that missed. I always believed Holland's statements in regards to the puff of smoke. Yes, a diversion, but no actual shooter? Possible. Something out of the ordinary happened where the two men were standing behind the fence. Perhaps even a simple firecracker, ignited behind the fence with a cigarette and it's flash caught the eye of the man in the RR switching tower.
--- End quote ---
It's True that many people inside Dealey Plaza said they initially mistook the shots being fired as firecrackers going off. It's False that an eye witness has Ever testified, or said they witnessed a firecracker being lit, thrown, or exploding on the ground inside Dealey Plaza at 12:30 on 11/22/63. There is Zero Eyewitness Testimony or Physical Evidence of any firecrackers being ignited inside Dealey Plaza as the JFK Motorcade passed through. None
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version