Gary Mack and the about face !

[Bill Brown]

To get this thread back on track, here's a few more comments on Mack.

People go where the money is.  Mack originally said that he saw among the silver nitrate blobs of one of the photos taken as Kennedy was murdered what appeared to him to be a man in a policeman's uniform aiming a gun.

Months or years later, down on his luck, Mack's offered the job as spokesman of the SFM. He suddenly does an about face and becomes the mouth piece of the official story, namely, that Oswald acted alone. Now, I'm not saying Mack was not a nice guy - perhaps he was. But I do find it dubious that he'd get up in front of a camera and act all official while Discovery channel was producing their highly fake shows.

I'll say it as nicely as I can - I find it highly underhanded for someone to do this.

You still don't have a clue what you're talking about.  Stop embarrassing yourself.

[Mitch Todd]

          Your pledging allegiance to the Manchester BOOK and its' 2nd hand information is up to you. My thought is that Tom Robinson would know the elapsed time between his eating dinner while watching the JFK Casket being unloaded from AF1, Suddenly Racing to Bethesda, walking into the morgue, and viewing Humes taking a bone saw to the head of the POTUS. Being Suddenly exposed to Events of this magnitude have a way of sticking with Everyday Joes.

Again, and I repeat myself, look at the other post [now posts] I wrote.

We know from what Robinson has told the ARRB and and HSCA investigators, both directly and indirectly, that his job was the cosmetic part.
Also, Robinson confirms Manchester [to the ARRB], stating that he rode in with Hagen. Hagen [in his ARRB testimony] agrees with Manchester that he didn't show up until late. It's not just Manchester.

[Chris Scally]

You still don't have a clue what you're talking about.  Stop embarrassing yourself.

Well said, Bill. Amen to that !
 

[Mike Orr]

The Parkland Staff figured out if the story was not what the Warren Commission said it was , then there was a good chance that those going against the WC could end up dead like JFK. I think once "They" assassinated Kennedy , then it was open season on those who were considered " Boat Rockers " and of course what goes with that as being one who was going to "Buck" the system like JFK , MLK , Bobby Kennedy and Malcolm X . In other words if you went against the Establishment , They will cut off your oxygen supply. JFK Jr. fell under that same canopy when he was said to have considered running for public office . I think " W " Bush felt threatened at the thought of JFK Jr. running for President . To think that LHO would be the reason for our Country to be turned upside down is just beyond belief .

[John Mytton]

These do not support your point since their authenticity is in doubt. The witnesses all said the BACK of JFK's head was blown out on November 22, 1963. Live with it.

These do not support your point since their authenticity is in doubt.

Huh? The Zapruder film, the X Rays and the Autopsy photos have all been repeatedly examined as authentic, the eyewitnesses are only confirming the physical evidence.

The witnesses all said the BACK of JFK's head was blown out on November 22, 1963. Live with it.

What a Bummer, your eyewitnesses are not at all consistent. Ouch!



Whereas my eyewitnesses all are extremely consistent and show exactly what the physical evidence shows.





JohnM

[John Mytton]

Curry wasn't a witness? What? He saw JFK up close. What does it take to be witness to you? Not to see anything on November 22, 1963, and to live in Australia?

Curry wasn't a witness?

No, we were talking about what eyewitnesses actually saw it happen, not the indecipherable bloody mess that arrived at Parkland.

Clint Hill saw Kennedy a few seconds later and would have had the best chance for evaluation.



Then there are the Dealey Plaza eyewitnesses who simply described what they saw and what they saw was precisely what we see in the Zapruder Film/Autopsy photos/X rays.





JohnM

[John Mytton]

I have been watching Nigel Turner's "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" series again recently and this shows perfectly that any LNer who claims that Gary Mack never endorsed a conspiracy regarding the JFK assassination is either ignorant or here to mislead.

Gary Mack was listed as a "series consultant" for the 1988 multi-part version. In his filmed interviews there is NO doubt that he was for the idea of conspiracy. He mentions detailed things that show a conspiracy took place.

Something other than evidence changed his mind.

This is sick, Gary isn't here to defend himself yet you still make these ridiculous accusations.

There is nothing wrong with being a conspiracy theorist and then after learning the real evidence siding with the truth that Oswald did it.

Many intelligent LNers were once CTs but after years of trusting the LIES that Caprio and his 10aday team have shoved down our throats, some of us actually decided to do our own research and by utilizing our own unbiased critical thinking skills we all came to the same inescapable logical conclusion that Oswald was a double murdering dirtbag!

Btw thankfully with the advent of the Internet, the ease to access the evidence makes Caprio's job of misdirection and deceit a lot harder!



JohnM