Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: More Fake Pictures of Oswald  (Read 5439 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1334
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #60 on: July 14, 2018, 04:08:21 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You guys keep getting it backwards. You must show it was possible with real world examples. I can't show you how it wasn't possible, which is what the HSCA was up against.

Feel free to get into the weeds with some photogrammetry, if you dare.

Good luck!

JackT





Wow Jack, you're all over the place you've been going to great lengths to point out all these discrepancies and now when faced with the prospect of actually supporting your nonsense you've revealed that you don't have a clue.
The HSCA supported all their conclusions with science and practical examples whereas your just a Big Mouth who barely knows how to use Google!



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #60 on: July 14, 2018, 04:08:21 AM »


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1334
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #61 on: July 14, 2018, 04:59:30 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Nope. The head is distorting but from ear to ear stays consistent. It might be undersized by no more than 1-2%, which is far less than the body is oversized. Here is the proof. I scaled the same photos relative to Oswald's leg length instead and applied the same algorithm.



There is only 1 conclusion I come to, and that is CE 133-A was shot with a different camera than the rest. Otherwise, the spherical aberration of the lens and quality of this photo clearly does not match the others. Oswald immediately claimed it was a fake, which probably meant a darkroom creation where a print of CE 133-A was photographed with Oswald's Imperial Reflex camera. This camera was not originally found with Oswald's possessions by the DPD. And this is not to be confused with Oswald's Minox spy camera or his superior 35mm Russian Cuera 2 camera, which was probably the camera that took the original CE 133-A.

This along with all the other shenanigans that the DPD where up to in the darkroom, including re-enactments and a curious cutout of CE 133-C, which was never submitted into evidence nor found with Oswald's possessions, makes the BYPs highly suspect. The fact that the DPD only leaked CE 133-A, which was the money shot where you could actually read the name of the commie lit, means they were an integral part of the conspiracy. They sheep-dipped Oswald to be the patsy with the BYPs, planted the gun in the TSBD, arrested him in record time, interrogated him in private and took no notes, then led him to his assassin who did the killing for them to gave them plausible deniability. This is why they didn't kill him in the theater. I could go on and on but you get the picture.  ;)




Your gif is not taking into account the wide-angle effect. In the original prints CE-133A and CE133B we see that Oswald was in differing parts of the frame and subsequently was affected by the predictable lens distortion.



In the following gif I applied approximately the same lens correction to CE-133b as seen in CE133a.



Even though there is a number of parallax changes between CE 133A and CE133B the following comparison shows the stairs and the fence and etc to be almost aligned.



Now when we take into account the wide angle effect and the differing positions of Oswald and Marina we see that Oswald's head when in the same position of the frame becomes the same shape and he is the same size.



Btw are you sure that there is different lens distortions in the backyard photos?



JohnM

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #62 on: July 15, 2018, 08:42:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wow Jack, you're all over the place you've been going to great lengths to point out all these discrepancies and now when faced with the prospect of actually supporting your nonsense you've revealed that you don't have a clue.
The HSCA supported all their conclusions with science and practical examples whereas your just a Big Mouth who barely knows how to use Google!

Mytton always ends up reverting back to a false appeal to authority.

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1010
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #63 on: July 15, 2018, 08:45:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mytton always ends up reverting back to a false appeal to authority.

Prove him wrong

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1334
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #64 on: July 15, 2018, 10:28:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mytton always ends up reverting back to a false appeal to authority.







Iacoletti, it's about time you came to grips with reality, you're basically just a Bum who has no technical expertise in any aspect of this case yet you continually set yourself as some sort of Ultimate Arbiter and with absolutely no evidence you keep giving us your "false appeal to your own personal opinion" as scientific refutation, you're just embarrassing yourself.



JohnM 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #64 on: July 15, 2018, 10:28:08 PM »


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1334
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #65 on: July 16, 2018, 08:14:01 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Which is exactly what your gifs do. Oh, you thought your gifs somehow tracked the facial features like facial recognition does, didn't you? :D




These are is images that the Apple face id sees, all these little dots are used to create a depth map of someone's face and since our faces are all unique this form of identification is virtually infallible.



Now to make it easier to comprehend my method of face comparison I've used a face with dots pasted on and these images are an example of the same data the apple software uses to unlock a three dimensional matching image.



In the following gif your fading technique is used and all we get is a jumbled mess.



But by using my methodology we go far beyond your crude fade code and now we are looking at a program which utilizes millions of lines of code to truly unlock the mathematical perfection of a precise rotating match between millions of spatially co-ordinated depth-mapped pixels.





JohnM
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 10:00:04 AM by John Mytton »

Online Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #66 on: July 16, 2018, 01:34:22 PM »
What are they doing to that poor guy?

Online Richard Smith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #67 on: July 16, 2018, 02:26:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login






Iacoletti, it's about time you came to grips with reality, you're basically just a Bum who has no technical expertise in any aspect of this case yet you continually set yourself as some sort of Ultimate Arbiter and with absolutely no evidence you keep giving us your "false appeal to your own personal opinion" as scientific refutation, you're just embarrassing yourself.



JohnM

Careful or John may resort to using his "strawman" rebuttal or the devastating "LOL" as in "Oswald's rifle - LOL." 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #67 on: July 16, 2018, 02:26:31 PM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #68 on: July 16, 2018, 10:34:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Prove him wrong

and Chapman always ends up reverting back to shifting the burden of proof.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #69 on: July 16, 2018, 10:38:47 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Iacoletti, it's about time you came to grips with reality, you're basically just a Bum who has no technical expertise in any aspect of this case yet you continually set yourself as some sort of Ultimate Arbiter and with absolutely no evidence you keep giving us your "false appeal to your own personal opinion" as scientific refutation, you're just embarrassing yourself.

Says the armchair photogrammetrist who has no technical expertise and continually regurgitates any nonsense that confirms his predetermined biases.

"Expert" said it, "Mytton" believes it, and that settles it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #69 on: July 16, 2018, 10:38:47 PM »