More Fake Pictures of Oswald

[John Mytton]

Here is a marketing tip John, if you are the inventor of a new breakthrough technology give it a name

I have no interest in marketing something which has no commercial value.
All it's really doing is a direct comparison between two different solid objects and when you have two identical objects then the depth mapping for each individual point on each object is precisely the same regardless of the angle to camera therefore when each point is connected in off centered photos we get perfect rotation but when something is even slightly out of alignment then we can immediately see it. It's like the floating part of an altered image that you get when stereoscopic images are viewed stereoscopically.
Now when applied to this problem we are at an advantage because pretty much by definition we all have our own unique face with each landmark having its own unique position in space and like the celebrity/lookalike examples above there is always a problem using this technique with non identical people.



JohnM

[Jerry Freeman]

Wiki should have used the conventional mug shot instead of the one below for their Oswald portrait. He has a triple hair line...we are back to a squarish jaw [sun must be shining] and a fat face.
Maybe John Mutton can use that no name technology trick on this one too.
On an ID card this guy's name is A J Hidell.. far left picture then far right [Dallas mug shot]
 The guy in the middle must be Oswald's basketball coach.

[Matt Grantham]

I have no interest in marketing something which has no commercial value.
All it's really doing is a direct comparison between two different solid objects and when you have two identical objects then the depth mapping for each individual point on each object is precisely the same regardless of the angle to camera therefore when each point is connected in off centered photos we get perfect rotation but when something is even slightly out of alignment then we can immediately see it. It's like the floating part of an altered image that you get when stereoscopic images are viewed stereoscopically.
Now when applied to this problem we are at an advantage because pretty much by definition we all have our own unique face with each landmark having its own unique position in space and like the celebrity/lookalike examples above there is always a problem using this technique with non identical people.



JohnM

 Sorry John that was not real marketing advice. I think your little app, or whatever it is, creates a way to blend one picture to another and nothing more

[Jerry Freeman]

 
..what on Earth is "infliable"?

You cannot fli it. 



 
 

[Jerry Freeman]

Which side was Oswald? Left? Right? Neither?



Kennedy and Tippit were almost a perfect facial match
 
 

 



 
 

 

[John Mytton]

Sorry John that was not real marketing advice. I think your little app, or whatever it is, creates a way to blend one picture to another and nothing more

Sorry John that was not real marketing advice.

Nothing you seem to say is real, but whatever floats your boat.

I think your little app, or whatever it is, creates a way to blend one picture to another and nothing more

No worries, your continued incompetent image analysis and complete lack of knowledge of the actual evidence being discussed is on full display therefore your opinion on what constitutes as visual proof is worthless.



JohnM 

[Matt Grantham]

Nothing you seem to say is real, but whatever floats your boat.

No worries, your continued incompetent image analysis and complete lack of knowledge of the actual evidence being discussed is on full display therefore your opinion on what constitutes as visual proof is worthless.



JohnM

 

 While you are busy disregarding me you could at least quote me correctly I have never put forward anything as visual proof, nor have I cited anyone claiming there was visual proof that the photos are forgeries. So please do not let me distract you from whatever it is you are supposedly proving