The Backyard Photos Have Insomnia

[John Mytton]

And Roscoe Whites little cutout of this picture was for what purpose?

The backyard plants at Neeley Street in the Roscoe White cutout picture shows dramatic growth as compared to Oswald's photo and therefore was taken much later and prove nothing.

But what is interesting is that Oswald when in custody denied living at this address, why would Oswald lie? I'll give you a hint;

http://www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg



JohnM

[Steve Howsley]

The backyard plants at Neeley Street in the Roscoe White cutout picture shows dramatic growth as compared to Oswald's photo and therefore was taken much later and prove nothing.

But what is interesting is that Oswald when in custody denied living at this address, why would Oswald lie? I'll give you a hint;

http://www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg



JohnM

Nice one John. Have the newspapers he's holding been dated? Presumably he'd have the most recent issue on hand and that might help in fixing a time range for that particular photo.

[Matt Grantham]

The backyard plants at Neeley Street in the Roscoe White cutout picture shows dramatic growth as compared to Oswald's photo and therefore was taken much later and prove nothing.

But what is interesting is that Oswald when in custody denied living at this address, why would Oswald lie? I'll give you a hint;

http://www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg


  I believe the predicate is the cutout picture 'proves' nothing



JohnM

[Matt Grantham]

The backyard plants at Neeley Street in the Roscoe White cutout picture shows dramatic growth as compared to Oswald's photo and therefore was taken much later and prove nothing.

But what is interesting is that Oswald when in custody denied living at this address, why would Oswald lie? I'll give you a hint;

http://www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg



 So Oswald just went out another time and took another picture of this same spot with nobody in the picture, and Roscoe wanted to place this weird cut out in it? Or did Oswald accidentally photograph an apparition?



JohnM

[Jerry Freeman]

 

Thanks for copying... my original post ..the unaltered TV footage creates a squared off chin 

 


I didn't 'copy' your post. You flatter yourself too much.
I'll have the readers take another glance at the photos. On the left side a normal Oswald. On the right ...a squashed up, distorted..flattened face Oswald. So I wouldn't call it 'unaltered'. [Maybe a crappy lens at worst]
Take a comparison to the screen and measure the respective tip of chin to eyebrow vs ear to ear difference.
 

[Walt Cakebread]

There's no doubt in my mind that CE 133A   ( same as De Morhenchildt print) is an authentic photo taken by Marina at the request of Lee Oswald.   Ther is evidence in both CE 133B and 133c of photo alteration.    Who altered the photos an why??

[John Mytton]

Mytton is up to his old tricks again. Lighting cannot make a cleft chin into a square chin no matter how many times he claims it.

Sorry Rob there is no tricks, it's always Oswald!





JohnM