The Backyard Photos Have Insomnia

[John Mytton]

And your evidence for this claim is?

The bush next to Oswald over the summer has dramatically increased its foliage, become much taller and has a much thicker trunk by the time that the cutout photo was taken.





JohnM

[John Mytton]

Baloney. When CE 133-A and CE 133-B where overlayed the head was in the exact same postion.

Instead of the heavily cropped and photocopy quality backyard photos as seen in your manipulative conspiracy books, here we have the full frame CE 133-A and CE 133-B and Oswald's head is in very different positions and upon close examination both heads show a multitude of expected differences and are not perfect duplicates. As they say in the classics, try again.





JohnM

[Matt Grantham]

Instead of the heavily cropped and photocopy quality backyard photos as seen in your manipulative conspiracy books, here we have the full frame CE 133-A and CE 133-B and Oswald's head is in very different positions and upon close examination both heads show a multitude of expected differences and are not perfect duplicates. As they say in the classics, try again.





JohnM

 I believe my question to Walt was who studied them and was in regard to facial expression and not just the position

[Richard Smith]

There's no doubt in my mind that CE 133A   ( same as De Morhenchildt print) is an authentic photo taken by Marina at the request of Lee Oswald.   Ther is evidence in both CE 133B and 133c of photo alteration.    Who altered the photos an why??

Why don't you give your own question some thought like a rational person for once?  If Oswald was willing to pose for one BY photo and that one is authentic, why would there be a need to fake others?  LOL.  They are either all genuine - as the evidence suggests - or all fakes as the kooks desperately want to believe.  What makes absolutely no sense is that one would be authentic and others faked as you have stupidly suggested.

[John Mytton]

I believe my question to Walt was who studied them and was in regard to facial expression and not just the position

The World doesn't revolve around you, look again, I was replying to Caprio. Doh



JohnM

[Jerry Freeman]

And Roscoe Whites little cutout of this picture was for what purpose?

For the readers who otherwise don't know about it...
This image was re-shot and re-done about a year after the original.
Dodging and burning was the old school technique for modern day photo shopping.





example...this was done using an an enlarger and a bit of practice.


Roscoe White was an expert in darkroom work.
A full review here....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodging_and_burning
 

[John Mytton]

example...this was done using an an enlarger and a bit of practice.

 

This obviously fake composite with wrong lighting, mismatching grain, terrible contrast which just looks fake is a perfect example of how difficult it is to combine two images.

To get Oswald to fit into the scene seamlessly requires photographing Oswald in the exact same position with what would have to be perfect recreated lighting and as seen in Jerry's example above, it ain't as easy as your imagination wants it to be.





JohnM