Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Michael Walton]

Show us photographs of JFK's head in its 'blown off' state.

There.  Happy?

[John Mytton]

Reminds me of a Henry Fonda movie called '12 Angry Men'.
Anyone ever see it?
Eleven guys just simply refused to believe in a reasonable doubt.
But after hours of deliberation...jurist Fonda got the unanimous acquittal that the lawyers couldn't seem to demonstrate....

You know Jerry, there is a lot more to researching this case than watching Henry Fonda movies!? God bless ya!



JohnM

[John Mytton]

But why would a lone nut choose to shoot the president at a time when at least 80 percent of his body was concealed and protected by the body of his limousine either?

-sigh- You've just answered Bugliosi's question and positively reinforced his conclusion, of course shooting a man who was moving and had most of his body concealed made a difficult job even more difficult but Oswald only had that one option. Whereas your massive conspiracy of people who had control over the FBI, the Dallas Police and the WC themselves could have easily killed Kennedy anywhere they liked!



JohnM

[Jerry Freeman]

It's the 'Kidnapper-In-Chief' who is deplorable
And you claimed in another thread that LNers are not interested in the truth
 

Who is this 'kidnapper' ?...Cut down on the liquor there.
Produce that post that you refer to... 

[Bill Chapman]

Who is this 'kidnapper' ?...Cut down on the liquor there.
Produce that post that you refer to...

Donald Trump = The Kidnapper-In-Chief
(as opposed to Commander-In-Chief)

Related to his having kids removed from their parents at the border

[Bill Chapman]

Et tu, Brute'

BUMP

[Jerry Freeman]

Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #6.

Speaking of silly arguments: 

"I don't think a conspiracy would have been done that way, therefore there was no conspiracy".

  +++
Could we find one that isn't silly?