Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 117984 times)

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #301 on: July 18, 2018, 08:49:54 PM »
Like I've said before, it must be fun being a CTroll
Anything goes, no critical thought needed
I swear, they must all be Trump supporters

It's the same mindset.

Although in Trump's defense (sort of), his critics are so over the top, so hysterical that you wind up throwing up your heads hands (but head too) and saying the hell with everything.

He's an ass, a jerk, a egomaniac, a child; he's not an American Hitler.



« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:11:22 AM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #302 on: July 18, 2018, 09:02:39 PM »

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #303 on: July 18, 2018, 10:48:04 PM »
Like I've said before, it must be fun being a CTroll
Anything goes, no critical thought needed
I swear, they must all be Trump supporters

 Thumb1:

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #304 on: July 18, 2018, 10:49:55 PM »
No doubt.
Jack Ruby was placed in solitary confinement until he died [rather suddenly as it happened]

Check your facts. Ruby died in hospital, not in prison and he didn't die of cancer as you seem to believe. Ruby died from a blood clot in his lung. Maybe you need to watch a few more UTUBE vids.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2018, 10:57:54 PM by Denis Pointing »

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #305 on: July 18, 2018, 10:51:50 PM »
Ruby's was.

If you think he needed to be silenced why then wait more than 3 years to shut him up?
 
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 02:11:28 PM by Steve Howsley »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #306 on: July 18, 2018, 11:08:48 PM »
Hilarious, another angry and desperate response just admit that Bugliosi's got you by the short and curlies and you just can't refute any of it.

We should just call this entire series of posts "The 'Mytton' Delusion".

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #307 on: July 18, 2018, 11:58:17 PM »
You go first...

In the meantime, witness Euins testified that the first shot came as the limo reached the end of the fountain area. FBI recreation images show that position, revealing that JFK would be almost totally exposed. Well, at least more than just the head and shoulders he wound up with for the twofer.

Given the fountain thing, logic dictates that Oswald originally attempted that course of action. The rest is history.

Nice cherry-pick, but logic doesn't dictate that Oswald attempted anything.  That's just your assumption.