Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 117983 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #294 on: July 17, 2018, 11:25:46 PM »
Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #29

Here we see Vince drop the trappings completely and go into full blown mindreading mode.

Extra LOLs for Bugliosi's stance that Oswald lied during interrogation except when he didn't.



Hilarious, another angry and desperate response just admit that Bugliosi's got you by the short and curlies and you just can't refute any of it.



JohnM

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #295 on: July 18, 2018, 07:19:48 AM »
I'm not the one trying to make the silly argument that if Oswald wanted to shoot the president, he only had one option for where to do it.

Tell us when you think the foxy Oswald + Friends started to plan an attempt on Kennedy and then maybe you can suggest  which locations or methods of attack would have him out & about rather than showing up for work that day.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #296 on: July 18, 2018, 01:23:44 PM »

Oswald wanted to assess what old fart Fritz (and the FBI) actually knew before playing his ace card.


What was that card? It sounds like you believe Oswald was involved and not the patsy he claimed to be.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #297 on: July 18, 2018, 04:27:50 PM »
Quote
Ruby, we know, lived more than three long years (1,154 days) after killing Oswald before passing away on January 3, 1967, and never once suggested that he killed Oswald for someone else.
No doubt.
Jack Ruby was placed in solitary confinement until he died [rather suddenly as it happened]

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #298 on: July 18, 2018, 08:04:12 PM »
No doubt.
Jack Ruby was placed in solitary confinement until he died [rather suddenly as it happened]

Cancer is sudden?

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #299 on: July 18, 2018, 08:08:14 PM »
Cancer is sudden?

Ruby arrested on November 24, 1963.
Ruby dies on January 3, 1967.

In conspiracy world that's another sudden, mysterious death.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #300 on: July 18, 2018, 08:30:01 PM »
Ruby arrested on November 24, 1963.
Ruby dies on January 3, 1967.

In conspiracy world that's another sudden, mysterious death.

Like I've said before, it must be fun being a CTroll
Anything goes, no critical thought needed
I swear, they must all be Trump supporters