Oswald's Shirt

[Jerry Freeman]

Lee was wearing a  brownish, reddish colored shirt at the time

Thanks for the help. I'm not the very best at literary expression
Oswald was wearing CE 151. He said he was..why would he lie?
He wore it unbuttoned over his T shirt.
One of the guys in another thread mentioned that he might have tied the sleeves around his waist.
People do that... tie their sweater sleeves when it gets warmer.
Conjecture...when he was busy...for comfort in warm spaces.
A 2nd floor woman said she saw Oswald in his T shirt.
Perhaps she didn't notice the tied up reddish shirt.
   

[Steve Logan]

I find it amusing how all these new nuts come in here all full of piss and vinegar with their James Files and latest youtube info . Upon seeing that Cakebread pounces on them like fresh meat and violates them with his fabricated loaded lance. Rinse, lather, repeat.

[Matt Grantham]

I thought others at the breakroom or on the trip exiting had said he was wearing a a white t shirt But yes it is possible that is a detail people could miss

[Walt Cakebread]

I thought others at the breakroom or on the trip exiting had said he was wearing a a white t shirt But yes it is possible that is a detail people could miss

I believe only Mrs Reid said that she thought that Lee was wearing a white Tee shirt.....  I believe she was mistaken and possibly recalling another occasion when she's seen Lee wearing a white Tee shirt.

But there's so much BS misinformation that you can believe whatever tingles your taste buds.   

However....If you believe that Lee was wearing a white Tee Shirt and was the man in the white clothing that witnesses saw behind a sixth floor window then the tuft of brown fibers on the butt of the rifle are not incriminating of the arch villain Lee Harrrrrvey Osssssswald. ( boooooo hissss)

[Walt Cakebread]

I find it amusing how all these new nuts come in here all full of piss and vinegar with their James Files and latest youtube info . Upon seeing that Cakebread pounces on them like fresh meat and violates them with his fabricated loaded lance. Rinse, lather, repeat.

Why are you so desperate to discredit me, Mr Logan?

If you want to discredit the information I present then your best effort would be the presentation of evidence that proves that the information I present is incorrect.   Ad hominem attacks are ineffective and show that you lack intelligence.

[Jerry Freeman]

Why are you so desperate to discredit me, Mr Logan?
 

It's what the parrots do...
Insult the poster ignore the post.
If not, they respond to conflicting statements or contradictions in evidence with a trite pithy aphorism like- so? ..or so what?.. who cares?.. proof?
The actual concept of scrutiny eludes these people who seem able to swallow a camel but yet gag on a gnat.
Does that just about explain it?

[John Iacoletti]

It's what the parrots do...
Insult the poster ignore the post.
If not, they respond to conflicting statements or contradictions in evidence with a trite pithy aphorism like- so? ..or so what?.. who cares?.. proof?
The actual concept of scrutiny eludes these people who seem able to swallow a camel but yet gag on a gnat.
Does that just about explain it?

If truth was really on their side, they wouldn't need to prop up their arguments with empty rhetoric.