JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Limo Bullet Fragments....
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 14, 2018, 05:14:30 PM ---It should be noted that regardless of whether the fragments came from one bullet or two, they are devastating evidence against LHO.
--- End quote ---
Patently absurd. A fragment tells you nothing about who fired it.
--- Quote ---"Ballistic experts Robert Frazier and Joseph Nicol examined the stretcher bullet and the two fragments recovered from the limousine and determined that they were fired from the rifle found on the sixth floor of the TSBD, to the exclusion of all other rifles in the world."
--- End quote ---
Yes, I know, because Frazier lined up the markings in his mind when they wouldn't line up under the microscope. But great. Now all you have to do is show that bullet found on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland Hospital and the two fragments allegedly recovered from the limousine were actually involved in the assassination.
--- Quote ---That is unless someone stole Saint Oz's rifle from the garage and used it to assassinate JFK.
--- End quote ---
Says the guy who can't even demonstrate that this rifle was ever in the garage.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on May 14, 2018, 06:32:30 PM ---Why would all of it need to be faked?
--- End quote ---
Classic LN strawman to divert from the reality that their "evidence", authentic or not, doesn't actually show that Oswald did it.
--- Quote ---Wow, you have the evidence to support that claim of C2766 being in that garage?
--- End quote ---
No, of course he doesn't.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on May 15, 2018, 05:02:16 AM ---Then cite your evidence. Why all the verbiage?
--- End quote ---
Verbiage is what they do when they don't actually have the solid evidence. Hence Bugliosi's 1648 pages. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t".
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 15, 2018, 08:18:48 PM ---Patently absurd. A fragment tells you nothing about who fired it.
Yes, I know, because Frazier lined up the markings in his mind when they wouldn't line up under the microscope. But great. Now all you have to do is show that bullet found on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland Hospital and the two fragments allegedly recovered from the limousine were actually involved in the assassination.
Says the guy who can't even demonstrate that this rifle was ever in the garage.
--- End quote ---
The fragments don't tell us who fired the gun but they do tell us what gun they were fired from. In this case C2766, which was ordered, paid for and possessed by Saint Oz.
Of course it's possible that the fragments weren't 'involved in the assassination' but only if you believe that fragments from a bullet fired by Saint Oz's C2766 were somehow in the limo prior to the assassination or planted there afterwards.
It's also possible that the rifle Marina photographed Saint Oz posing with and the rifle she saw blanketed in the garage wasn't C2766.
Of course, something being possible doesn't mean it's likely or even a reasonable consideration.
The fragments are very conclusive proof.
LHO: GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 15, 2018, 09:29:21 PM ---In this case C2766, which was ordered,
--- End quote ---
According to unscientific handwriting "analysis" of two block letters on a photograph of a microfilm copy of a 2 inch order coupon.
--- Quote --- paid for
--- End quote ---
According to unscientific handwriting "analysis" of a money order found in Virginia that shows no link whatsoever to any specific Klein's order.
--- Quote --- and possessed by Saint Oz.
--- End quote ---
You got nothing there.
--- Quote ---Of course it's possible that the fragments weren't 'involved in the assassination' but only if you believe that fragments from a bullet fired by Saint Oz's C2766 were somehow in the limo prior to the assassination or planted there afterwards.
--- End quote ---
Only if you believe that the "limo fragments" were ever in the limo. Too bad there is no documented chain of custody.
--- Quote ---It's also possible that the rifle Marina photographed Saint Oz posing with and the rifle she saw blanketed in the garage wasn't C2766.
Of course, something being possible doesn't mean it's likely or even a reasonable consideration.
--- End quote ---
You can either prove it is or you cannot.
--- Quote ---The fragments are very conclusive proof.
--- End quote ---
Of what exactly?
--- Quote ---LHO: GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
--- End quote ---
LOL
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version