JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Hoover's recently released memo; does it prove conspiracy?
Jake Maxwell:
J. Edgar Hoover's recently released memo below - only two days after the assassination, Nov. 24, 1963 - shows a rush to judgment regarding Oswald - and quite possibly a rush to cover-up...
Shouldn't this be considered the most relevant piece of evidence for a conspiracy?
"The thing I am concerned about, and so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
Matthew Finch:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on May 11, 2018, 06:46:55 AM ---"The thing I am concerned about, and so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
Real as opposed to...?
--- End quote ---
This can be taken a couple of ways. It can be seen at face value as trying to cover up (if the 'real' assassin was not Oswald). But it can also be seen as a completely innocent way of trying to ensure the public know the truth and don't erroneously think they are being fed a story.
Translation of the first way:
"Cripes, we don't want the public to find out that this was a conspired job, how can we ensure the public believes that it was Oswald?"
Translation of the second way:
"We know Oswald did it, but how on Earth do we ensure the public knows for sure it was Oswald...?"
That's how I read it (the second way).
Matthew Finch:
Do you have it to hand?
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Tony Fratini on May 11, 2018, 02:10:01 AM ---Shouldn't this be considered the most relevant piece of evidence for a conspiracy?
conspiracy - no
cover up - absolutely
WW III involving a nuclear exchange was a distinct possibility especially if either Russia or Cuba were implicated in the assassination of JFK.
Easier for everyone to blame everything on 2 random and demented LNers and leave it at that. Even better since one of them was killed on the 24th before testifying and the other died of cancer while in prison.
WW III averted = everyone can go back to business.
--- End quote ---
Or so it would seem......except for Lee Oswald and his family..... And this is NOT the American way. ( nor should it be for any christian nation.)
The murder of JFK was the way of the mob..... and John Edgar Hoover understood the tacit well.
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Matthew Finch on May 11, 2018, 12:42:51 PM ---This can be taken a couple of ways. It can be seen at face value as trying to cover up (if the 'real' assassin was not Oswald). But it can also be seen as a completely innocent way of trying to ensure the public know the truth and don't erroneously think they are being fed a story.
Translation of the first way:
"Cripes, we don't want the public to find out that this was a conspired job, how can we ensure the public believes that it was Oswald?"
Translation of the second way:
"We know Oswald did it, but how on Earth do we ensure the public knows for sure it was Oswald...?"
That's how I read it (the second way).
--- End quote ---
If the intent was the second interpretation as you believe.... Then why did the authorities ( The DPD and Hoover's agents) create false evidence. If Lee Oswald had been guilty then there should have been no reason to create false evidence. The evidence should speak for itself.
False evidence announces a frame up.....
But the simple fact is..... The WR is obviously a damned lie. If Lee was guilty then there should have been no need to create the elaborate lie.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version