JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Hoover's recently released memo; does it prove conspiracy?
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Jake Maxwell on June 11, 2018, 07:48:56 PM ---Putting an ear-ring on a pig doesn't make the pig smell any better...
Any law enforcement officer who is willing destroy someone's life and family because the officer is trying to save the neighborhood - or even trying to avert WWIII - is just as much a thug deserving of our full disdain, as the law enforcement officer who is willing to destroy someone's life and family to cover-up his involvement in killing a president for whatever reason....
There is no justification here at all... the end result, does not justify the means to that end....
--- End quote ---
Except that is not what happened. Hoover and the FBI believed Oswald was guilty based on the evidence. They had the same basic evidence to link him to this crime at that time as we do today. Gun, flight, nutty political background, murder of a police officer etc. Hoover didn't want WWIII based on the erroneous assumption that the Cubans or Russians were involved. That was a very sensible and admirable course of action. Thus, it was important to convince the public of Oswald's guilt because he was guilty and baseless rumors of the involvement of other countries could have led to the deaths of millions.
Jake Maxwell:
Within 2 to 3 days, two top government officials express their common concern that the public must be convinced that Oswald is the real assassin of the president, and that there is no conspiracy.
Nicholas Katzenbach, the deputy attorney general at the time, wrote a memo the day after Hoover wrote his memo, restating similar concerns:
"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."
For any investigator to think he or she has all the evidence to rule out any accomplices in an assassination within 3 days, is ridiculous. It was an effort to frame Oswald - most likely motivated as a cover-up.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Richard Rubio on June 11, 2018, 05:08:51 PM ---That all may be so ... but this isn't about that, it would be about avoiding frightening escalations with the Soviets.
--- End quote ---
This Thread is about the Hoover Memo which was dated 2 days after the assassination. Hoover basically Tarring Oswald only 2 days after the assassination is Wrong whatever his motivation(s) might be.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version