The Magic Bullet

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Magic Bullet  (Read 235253 times)

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #196 on: May 27, 2018, 01:17:10 AM »
Good call, and I would speculate that shooter in the sewer had periscope eyes like them aliens in Men in Black . And was sitting on a whoopee cushion.

 Probably roomier than snipers nest

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #197 on: May 27, 2018, 01:37:42 AM »
The best image I can find that shows JFK is struck and Governor Connally has not yet been hit [just as JBC stated in his hospital interview]



Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #198 on: May 27, 2018, 06:54:23 AM »
How can anyone believe JFK and JBC were hit by a single bullet fired from 60 feet in the air?

As Cyril Wecht pointed out during the HSCA, JFK would need to be tying his shoes for the trajectory to work.






Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #199 on: May 27, 2018, 08:26:54 PM »
How can anyone believe JFK and JBC were hit by a single bullet fired from 60 feet in the air?

As Cyril Wecht pointed out during the HSCA, JFK would need to be tying his shoes for the trajectory to work.

The question is not whether a shot through JFK could have hit Gov. Connally. Rather it is whether it hit Gov. Connally in the right armpit.

There is no problem with the vertical alignment of JBC's wounds and JFK's throat wound.  The car was 60 feet below the SN but about 165 feet distant at the time of the shot that struck JFK's neck. That makes a vertcal angle of 20 degrees below the horizontal. The car was on a downward 3 degree angle.  So the angle through JFK's body was a downward 17 degrees,  JFK's seat was higher than JBC's jump seat and his neck exit wound was about 24" from the back of that jump seat.  Over that 24" distance a bullet travelling on a 17 degree downward path would have dropped another 7.5 inches which means it would have cleared the back of the jump seat.

It is the horizontal - right to left - trajectory that is a problem.  The trajectory is consistent with a shot through JFK to the left side of JBC but not with a strike to the far right side. The right to left angle was at least 12 degrees.  Over that 24" distance the bullet through JFK would have travelled 5" farther left. So for JBC's right armpit, located 7.87 inches right of JBC's spine, to be in the path of that bullet, he would have to havd been 13" left of JFK. That is the problem with the trajectory.
.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 09:19:11 PM by Andrew Mason »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #200 on: May 27, 2018, 08:42:37 PM »
The question is not whether a shot through JFK could have hit Gov. Connally. Rather it is whether it hit Gov. Connally in the right armpit.

There is no problem with the vertical alignment of JBC's wounds and JFK's throat wound. It is the horizontal - right to left - trajectory that is a problem.  The trajectory is consistent with a shot through JFK to the left side of JBC but not with a strike to the far right side.

If you are a serious researcher, then show us how there is no problem with the "vertical" MB trajectory (yaw). Use 2 lasers to do a re-enactment. It's a cheap, simple experiment that is deadly accurate. So far not a single LNer has pulled it off else we would have heard about it by now. They obviously aren't interested in the truth.

Demonstrating the MB trajectory was possible is the only way to support your claims. Otherwise, we must assume that you are either too lazy, don't care, or you have done it already and wish you hadn't.



Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #201 on: May 27, 2018, 09:40:15 PM »
If you are a serious researcher, then show us how there is no problem with the "vertical" MB trajectory (yaw). Use 2 lasers to do a re-enactment. It's a cheap, simple experiment that is deadly accurate. So far not a single LNer has pulled it off else we would have heard about it by now. They obviously aren't interested in the truth.

Demonstrating the MB trajectory was possible is the only way to support your claims. Otherwise, we must assume that you are either too lazy, don't care, or you have done it already and wish you hadn't.


First of all, JFK was not sitting on a chair as you have shown.  He was.on a seat that was sloped backward and was lower to tbe floor. It was about 6" higher than JBC's jump seat which was mounted on the floor.  That put his adams apple about 4 to 6 inches higher than JBC's adams apple. The downward trajectory of 17 degrees causes a drop of 7.5 inches from JFK to JBC's seatback.  That puts it just above the height of JBC's armpit level when it passes the plane of JBC's seat back, which is 24" from JFK's throat exit wound.. See this 3D model.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 10:08:53 PM by Andrew Mason »

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: The Magic Bullet
« Reply #202 on: May 27, 2018, 10:30:09 PM »
The frontal neck wound never traversed the body and the entry wound in the back never traversed the body . At what point did the " Magic Bullet " become the "Magic Bullet" . It's quite obvious that per Humes, the shot in JFK's back ended at the little finger knuckle and it was angled down at a 45 to 60 degree angle. Now if there is not a path through the president by either bullet , then there should have been two bullets left in JFK. Fords movement of the back wound to the base of the back of the neck was to say the least a move that was very debatable and quite dishonest to say the least. Now if Humes says that the back wound did not extend past the little finger knuckle , then it does not matter where Ford would have placed the back wound because per Humes the path in the back was short and at a 45 to 60 degree downward angle. We know on thing for sure, the wound in the back of JFK was lower than what the front entry wound was on JFK !