Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer  (Read 1235384 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #476 on: June 13, 2018, 09:51:48 PM »
Yeah, right, the president's been shot and the FBI have no jurisdiction.

The only way that the FBI would have jurisdiction is if they suspected that the killings were a part of a conspiracy. They were at the Texas Theatre as observers. Nothing more.

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #477 on: June 13, 2018, 09:54:24 PM »
The ambiguity is there. Your comment bewilders me.

 OK Tim you tell me what you believe the amount of leeway the term "approximately" merits in a context such as this If such large latitudes are to be accepted then closer questioning should be required Do you have a time of arrest at the theater? Doesn't the McAdams transcript show the Dispatcher says at 1.40 'They already have hi' in reference to the Tippit suspect?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2018, 10:08:03 PM by Matt Grantham »

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #478 on: June 13, 2018, 10:03:38 PM »
Go and punch a cop and see if you don't get a ride downtown.

None of the other boxes in that section are checked either. That's left for nerdy office guys in glasses to get all uppity & anal about.

Interestingly enough, if you do a Google search for Oswald's arrest report you see it in various versions.  Including one with a notation "Assault to murder off # F85954".  It is also dated 11-22-63 and signed by Fritz with an additional charge that is difficult to make out but something like "1 assault to murder."  I wonder if the kooks have been intentionally dishonest again by using an early version of the arrest report that was not final?

https://clickamericana.com/eras/1960s/lee-harvey-oswalds-dallas-police-info-1963

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #479 on: June 13, 2018, 10:06:48 PM »
OK Tim you tell me what you believe the amount of leeway the term "approximately" merits in a context such as this If such large latitudes are to be accepted then closer questioning should be required Do you a time of arrest at the theater?

When someone uses the hour or half hour in their approximation, a give or take of 15 minutes seems reasonable. Some witnesses to the Tippit shooting said they heard the shots at approximately 1:00 pm. Others said approximately 1:30 pm.

Oswald was arrested at 1:50 pm, give or take a minute or two.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #480 on: June 13, 2018, 10:09:18 PM »
  Doesn't the McAdams transcript show the Dispatcher says at 1.40 'They already have hi' in reference to the Tippit suspect?

"No, that wasn't the right one. (1:44 p.m.)"

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #481 on: June 13, 2018, 10:11:26 PM »
When someone uses the hour or half hour in their approximation, a give or take of 15 minutes seems reasonable. Some witnesses to the Tippit shooting said they heard the shots at approximately 1:00 pm. Others said approximately 1:30 pm.

Oswald was arrested at 1:50 pm, give or take a minute or two.

 What does the dispatcher saying they already got him at 1.40 signify?

 In terms of reasonable approximations It depends on the context, in a court setting I would suggest no more than five

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #482 on: June 13, 2018, 10:14:34 PM »
Thanks Tim

  Barret says he arrived sometime after 2 , yet Oswald was in custody at 1.50?

Show us where Barrett said 'sometime after 2'
Pretty sure he said 'approximately' 2

You wouldn't happen to be twisting what Barret actually said, now would you...