Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Walt Cakebread]

Mr. BALL. You did not? Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before did you recognize anybody from their face?
Mrs. MARKHAM. From their face, no.

Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before

Was this a veiled attempt to prod Markham and remind her of what had been rehearsed ?

[John Iacoletti]

The revolver that magically appeared at the Texas Theater was a Smith & Wesson.... so it was NOT the gun that the witnesses saw being unloaded one shell at a time as the killer walked away.

Correction:  The revolver that magically appeared in Gerald Hill's pocket.

[John Iacoletti]

Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before

Was this a veiled attempt to prod Markham and remind her of what had been rehearsed ?

Yep.  There are signs in several testimonies that people were coached beforehand.

[Walt Cakebread]

Correction:  The revolver that magically appeared in Gerald Hill's pocket.

Correction accepted...I assumed that the revolver was the same revolver that appeared at the TT.......  And I think it was, but as I see it , it's no big deal....There is no proof that Lee Oswald had that revolver in the theater.....   We have only the word of the cops who were there and they have proven themselves to be damned liars.

[Martin Weidmann]

Hmm, so that's what Martin Weidmann has been doing, speculating? Somebody ought to tell him this, don't you think?

It's a telling sign when a die hard LN finds himself confronted with information he can not counter with credible arguments. They will try every trick in the book, ranging from outright dismissal to ridicule, from trying to change the subject to muddy the waters and pretending not to understand and so on.

There's just one thing they will never ever do; enter into an open and honest discussion about the information that has been presented.

[John Mytton]

It's a telling sign when a die hard LN finds himself confronted with information he can not counter with credible arguments. They will try every trick in the book, ranging from outright dismissal to ridicule, from trying to change the subject to muddy the waters and pretending not to understand and so on.

There's just one thing they will never ever do; enter into an open and honest discussion about the information that has been presented.

Another feeble attempt to paint the honest and heroic LNers in a bad light, we have a mountain of evidence on our side and you can't even speculate a solution, it's just attack attack attack, with no conclusions. You just have to look at the pathetic way you treat Markham to see the massive contradictions in the way you approach the evidence.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Another feeble attempt to paint the honest and heroic LNers in a bad light, we have a mountain of evidence on our side and you can't even speculate a solution, it's just attack attack attack, with no conclusions. You just have to look at the pathetic way you treat Markham to see the massive contradictions in the way you approach the evidence.

JohnM

Thanks for confirming the point I was making, John