Non problematic evidence?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Non problematic evidence?  (Read 76447 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2018, 03:23:01 AM »
Quote from: Rob Caprio on April 26, 2018, 02:44:05 AM
  It is worthless

Yeah... :P...was as close as I could come to 'tongue in cheek' ;D
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2018, 09:52:36 PM »
Logged

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2018, 02:23:55 AM »
Amazing!

Is there really no LN who can name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied (or even just tentatively, yet convincingly) linked to Oswald that is so credible it points to his guilt?
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2018, 03:35:45 PM »
He left his wedding ring at home.

Logged

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2018, 07:06:38 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on April 28, 2018, 03:35:45 PM
He left his wedding ring at home.



That's it... It's all over now.

Poor dumb cop, eh John...
« Last Edit: April 28, 2018, 07:08:16 PM by Bill Chapman »
Logged

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2018, 01:44:27 AM »
Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 28, 2018, 02:23:55 AM
Amazing!

Is there really no LN who can name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied (or even just tentatively, yet convincingly) linked to Oswald that is so credible it points to his guilt?

Name one LNer who claims any one piece of evidence, on it's own, would convict.
Logged

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2018, 01:52:10 AM »
Quote from: Bill Chapman on April 29, 2018, 01:44:27 AM
Name one LNer who claims any one piece of evidence, on it's own, would convict.

Where did I use the words "would convict"?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19
« previous next »