Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[Bernd Werner]

Then why did the autopsy doctors make that assertion?

I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

[John Iacoletti]

I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

So if your point is that the autopsy doctors didn't know what they were doing, I'll go along with that.

[Matt Grantham]

 Bernard  said

I know, that there was no analysis of the bullet path of the non lethal wound. If this path was not analysed, no definite assertion about the angle of the entering bullet could be made. If anyone cites this angle as evidence against the single bullet theory, I'd call this person disingenuous! I for myself try to relate on actual evidence.


 Matt replies  Who has ever asserted this? Folks cite that most of them thought it was an entrance wound, but the angle? I don't get it

[Mike Orr]

 Specter asked Pierre xxxx, " Could CE 399 have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?"

 "No," xxxx replied, " for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist," the problem being as xxxx put it, " there was practically no loss of this bullet."

[Tim Nickerson]

Specter asked Pierre xxxx, " Could CE 399 have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?"

 "No," xxxx replied, " for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist," the problem being as xxxx put it, " there was practically no loss of this bullet."

xxxx was wrong. There were five fragments in the wrist. One of the five was considerably larger than the other four. If all five fragments had been the size of the largest, their combined mass would still not exceed the amount of mass missing from CE-399.

[John Iacoletti]

xxxx was wrong.

That's easy for you to say.

There were five fragments in the wrist. One of the five was considerably larger than the other four. If all five fragments had been the size of the largest, their combined mass would still not exceed the amount of mass missing from CE-399.

That would require that you know what the starting mass of CE399 was...

[Mike Orr]

Ballistics evidence for CE 399 which was barely distorted and almost whole despite claims that it broke 10cm of Connally's 5th rib and shattered his radius ( wrist )and had a fragment or fragments left in his thigh that were not removed . CE 399 also has a very dubious chain of possession . This alone would probably result in CE 399 not being allowed as evidence in a court .