JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Autopsy proves SBT impossible
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 11, 2018, 11:07:07 AM ---Most likely struck concrete to the right rear of the limo and was never recovered.
Now you tell me, if the SBT is incorrect....what happened to the bullet that hit JFK in the back....and if the throat wound wasn't an exit wound what caused that wound and what happened to that bullet ?
If you think the SBT is wrong - come up with something better.
--- End quote ---
According to the trajectory, it went to JBC's left side. It did not appear to strike the car. So it struck JBC on the left side.
--- Quote ---Not only has the SBT not been proven wrong, the more you study the assassination, the more obvious it becomes that it's the only truly viable theory that explains what we see in Zapruder and the wounds to both men.
--- End quote ---
It is disproved by the evidence. There is a much simpler explanation that fits the evidence and, of course, that Oswald fired all three shots.
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on May 12, 2018, 06:07:39 AM ---According to the trajectory, it went to JBC's left side. It did not appear to strike the car. So it struck JBC on the left side.
It is disproved by the evidence. There is a much simpler explanation that fits the evidence and, of course, that Oswald fired all three shots.
--- End quote ---
You're correct about the 3 shots but the rest of your analysis is seriously flawed.
You have the first shot hitting JFK and going where ? Hitting JBC on the left side ?
Makes no sense.
Jack Nessan:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on May 11, 2018, 02:02:40 PM --- You already asked this. Was there something in the answer you did not agree with?
--- End quote ---
What answer? No answer is an an answer. The only explanation there is for JBC's wound is a bullet passing through JFK. Despite all the posturing and gnashing of teeth about how impossible it was for one bullet to cause all the wounds, in the end it is the only possible answer there is. It seems to be a lot easier to question the actions of the WC and DPD and the vaguery of what they should have done, than it is to actually explain the mechanics of the assassination.
HSCA Trajectory Analysis.
Mr. SAWYER. If we were to start at the other end then and assume that a bullet were fired at the approximate time we have determined from the sixth floor of the depository, would it have of necessity given the wounds in the President, would it of necessity, based on what you have determined as to locations somewhat, also have hit Governor Connally?
Mr. CANNING. The bullet would have had to have been substantially deflected by passing through the President in order to miss the Governor. It seems almost inevitable that the Governor would be hit with the alinements that we have found.
Mr. SAWYER. So that if we assume, as apparently is the fact, that this jacketed bullet did not hit anything solid in the way of bone in the President but only traversed the soft tissue of the neck, and presuming the approximate location of the limousine at the time and the posture as nearly as can be determined of the President at that time, that in your view then, absent a deflection of that bullet, it could not have missed Governor Connally.
Mr. CANNING. That is my view, yes.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 12, 2018, 07:00:54 AM ---You're correct about the 3 shots but the rest of your analysis is seriously flawed.
You have the first shot hitting JFK and going where ? Hitting JBC on the left side ?
Makes no sense.
--- End quote ---
It went to the left of JBC's midline, according to the trajectory and the observed positions of the two men. JBC had one wound on the left side. What does not make sense?
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Jack Nessan on May 12, 2018, 01:43:52 PM ---
Essential? It is simply what happened. Why would you want a false understanding of the assassination? If you are able to show that SBT is not true then do so.
Most witnesses did not notice JBC but there are a few witnesses, including Nelly and Jackie, who did and who state JBC was hit by the first shot . There was only one bullet and fragments of another bullet recovered, the fact there was only two shots simply aids and clarifies the understanding of the assassination.
--- End quote ---
Neither Nellie nor Jackie stated that JBC was hit by the first shot.
He did receive a small wound on the first shot but JBC did not feel and did not react to it. He did not notice it until the next day. What he reacted to was the sound of the first shot. He immediately recognized it as a rifle shot and he feared an assassination was taking place and turned around to see JFK. His "oh, no, no, no" drew Jackie's attention. Nellie said he uttered those words before the second shot. You can see him saying "oh, no, no, no" in the z240s and you can see Jackie turning to look at him.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version