JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 12, 2018, 03:39:29 PM ---
I don't know why this is so difficult for some.
This is not a courtroom. IF someone believes that nobody could do the shooting then that is something that is provable obviously. They could set it up and prove that it cannot be done. IF they could do this the case is closed and they win.
There is no benefit to proving that someone could do the shooting. That does not close the case. Why would LN bother with that? IF there was a shooting exhibition that could prove Oswald did it, it would have been done long ago,.
The pushback makes no sense. There is a group of people who's life work is basically to prove a conspiracy and if they believe the shots could not be made then they have a way to end the debate. What are they waiting for?
--- End quote ---
The point was for the general case. It was not about Oswald in particular Apparently you are unwilling to go there
As for no benefit for the LN, Examination of the verfiability of evidence is not based on whether it benefits a particular 'side'
If it meaningless why did CBS spend so much effort on it It comes up as one of the main questions but one you somewhat idiosyncratically consider unimportant
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 12, 2018, 03:39:29 PM ---
I don't know why this is so difficult for some.
This is not a courtroom. IF someone believes that nobody could do the shooting then that is something that is provable obviously. They could set it up and prove that it cannot be done. IF they could do this the case is closed and they win.
There is no benefit to proving that someone could do the shooting. That does not close the case. Why would LN bother with that? IF there was a shooting exhibition that could prove Oswald did it, it would have been done long ago,.
The pushback makes no sense. There is a group of people who's life work is basically to prove a conspiracy and if they believe the shots could not be made then they have a way to end the debate. What are they waiting for?
--- End quote ---
What are they waiting for?
A government that will conduct an honest investigation......
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on April 19, 2018, 05:33:32 PM ---It will never happen.
--- End quote ---
Are you saying that Americans lack the courage of Russians?
Why are there monuments to Hoover and LBJ in the US? ....But no monuments to Lenin or Stalin in Russia? ..or Hitler in Germany... or Saddam Hussein in Iraq
The Russians faced the facts that Stalin was simply a brutal mass murderer and removed any monument.... Do we Americans lack the brains and guts to face reality?
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on April 20, 2018, 03:45:02 PM ---The government is never going to run an honest investigation. I don't think they know how to.
--- End quote ---
Do we really need "government experts" ( at blowin smoke) to tell us what we can see with our own eyes? ie;.. That the Warren report is one of the biggest crocks in history.
Any person who has the guts to face the facts and can be honest with himself doesn't need government "experts" to think for him.
Brian Walker:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 12, 2018, 09:13:24 PM --- The point was for the general case. It was not about Oswald in particular Apparently you are unwilling to go there
As for no benefit for the LN, Examination of the verfiability of evidence is not based on whether it benefits a particular 'side'
If it meaningless why did CBS spend so much effort on it It comes up as one of the main questions but one you somewhat idiosyncratically consider unimportant
--- End quote ---
I guess you are just not going to grasp it. Will try one more time.
There are Ct who think that the shooting that Oswald did was actually not doable. No all they have to do is set up the condition and show that. If they do then they have proven a conspiracy.
Now don't bother wondering off into courtroom issues or even LN issues. What a posted her is simple and plain to see. I am telling them how to prove they are correct.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version