JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
Brian Walker:
1- I now a lot of CT's believe that nobody could have made the shot from the 6th floor with that rifle. If they really believe that why not build the exact setup from 6th floor to car and challenge people to try it. If Ct's honestly believe that it could not be done then this is a sure fire way to prove a conspiracy.
Joe Elliott:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 08, 2018, 02:54:30 AM ---
1- I now a lot of CT's believe that nobody could have made the shot from the 6th floor with that rifle. If they really believe that why not build the exact setup from 6th floor to car and challenge people to try it. If Ct's honestly believe that it could not be done then this is a sure fire way to prove a conspiracy.
--- End quote ---
Paul can easily do this by building a sniper?s nest with boxes too big to shoot around.
If need be, he could build one without windows, showing the shots could not have been made.
To be honest, if the CTers did build an ?exact replica? of the sixth floor sniper?s nest, from where the shots could not be replicated by anyone. I would suspect the ?extra replica? was not really an exact replica.
In any case the conspirators did seem to be a curious lot.
** They framed an ex-Marine who couldn?t shoot straight.
** They planted a rifle and made fake documents to connected to Oswald, but the type of rifle could not actually be used.
** They fired shots in a pattern which could have been made by one rifle, but not the type of rifle they planted.
** They setup a fake sniper?s nest from which the shots could not have been made, with any rifle, because the boxes were placed in the wrong positions.
** They ended up killing the President by firing form a different direction then the direction they wanted everyone to think the shots came from.
** The failed to get Oswald to be at the sniper?s nest during the shooting.
This is just a partial list, just off the top of my head. I?m sure I left a lot off.
It seems that in every possible way, the conspirators messed up when they tried to frame Oswald.
Jack Trojan:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 08, 2018, 02:54:30 AM ---1- I now a lot of CT's believe that nobody could have made the shot from the 6th floor with that rifle. If they really believe that why not build the exact setup from 6th floor to car and challenge people to try it. If Ct's honestly believe that it could not be done then this is a sure fire way to prove a conspiracy.
--- End quote ---
Problem is you can't prove a negative. Just because no one else can do it doesn't prove Oswald couldn't have done it. The onus is on the LNers to show that it could have been done, even using a wonky scope. That won't prove that Oswald did it, only that it was possible. So far no one has shown it was even possible. Does this mean it was unlikely?
Dan DAlimonte:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 08, 2018, 02:54:30 AM ---1- I now a lot of CT's believe that nobody could have made the shot from the 6th floor with that rifle. If they really believe that why not build the exact setup from 6th floor to car and challenge people to try it. If Ct's honestly believe that it could not be done then this is a sure fire way to prove a conspiracy.
--- End quote ---
Buy a 1985 DeLorean.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Dan DAlimonte on April 08, 2018, 03:17:12 PM ---Buy a 1985 DeLorean.
--- End quote ---
Jack I appreciate you posted that the onus is on the prosecution of Oswald to prove this You raise a generally valid point that just because no one else can repeat a certain feat does not mean it is impossible The word impossible is generally loaded if we wish to get technical However our legal system is supposedly based on reasonable doubt towards the proof against the accused not a limitless a panoply of "could be's" in terms of how a person may have transcended the seemingly impossible
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version