JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Mike Orr on April 09, 2018, 06:10:51 PM ---If Marine Carlos Hathcock could have made the shots of duplication as Oswald was said to have done , then you would have heard him say " I made those shots , so it can be done" ! Several people with arms expertise could not make the shots . If anyone would have made those shots , there is a very good chance that we would have heard about it . As Hale Boggs would say " We have not been told the truth about Oswald". Boggs said that " LBJ lied his eyes out to the Commission" before his plane disappeared in Alaska. CT's don't have to prove anything. What the Parkland Staff said about the blasted out back of the head of JFK got the truth going until Bethesda did their work on the President. Parkland had no reason to lie , where as Bethesda did a chop job to fit their needs. A very sad state of affairs. These people were so cheap that they couldn't even throw down a good rifle to be found. They throw down a piece of xxxx Carcano . We have more than just a few things that can prove a Conspiracy !!!!!!!!!!!
--- End quote ---
Seems Oswald was a better shot than the testers, then.
;)
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Brian Walker on April 09, 2018, 05:58:26 PM ---My post was intended for people who claim that nobody could make the shots. There is a way right there to prove a conspiracy. If they honestly believe that they what are they waiting for?
There is no incentive to prove Oswald could have made the shots and basically no way to prove it. You can only show that the shots were doable and that has already been done.
--- End quote ---
Sorry I am dropping in on the thread ,but where has it already been shown those shots have been replicated?
Jack Trojan:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on April 09, 2018, 11:16:58 AM ---
How do you know for sure that the scope was used?
--- End quote ---
Why else would Oswald keep the scope on the MC if he dissembled/reassembled it when he knew he'd be using the iron sights instead?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Jack Trojan on April 08, 2018, 03:57:50 AM ---Problem is you can't prove a negative. Just because no one else can do it doesn't prove Oswald couldn't have done it. The onus is on the LNers to show that it could have been done, even using a wonky scope. That won't prove that Oswald did it, only that it was possible. So far no one has shown it was even possible. Does this mean it was unlikely?
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on April 09, 2018, 11:16:58 AM ---How do you know for sure that the scope was used?
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on April 09, 2018, 05:51:28 PM ---Since it was not taken off the rifle, how do you know that it wasn't used?
--- End quote ---
I don't know whether or not the scope was used. Why does Jack Trojan pretend to know that it was?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Mike Orr on April 09, 2018, 06:10:51 PM ---If Marine Carlos Hathcock could have made the shots of duplication as Oswald was said to have done , then you would have heard him say " I made those shots , so it can be done" ! Several people with arms expertise could not make the shots . If anyone would have made those shots , there is a very good chance that we would have heard about it . As Hale Boggs would say " We have not been told the truth about Oswald". Boggs said that " LBJ lied his eyes out to the Commission" before his plane disappeared in Alaska. CT's don't have to prove anything. What the Parkland Staff said about the blasted out back of the head of JFK got the truth going until Bethesda did their work on the President. Parkland had no reason to lie , where as Bethesda did a chop job to fit their needs. A very sad state of affairs. These people were so cheap that they couldn't even throw down a good rifle to be found. They throw down a piece of xxxx Carcano . We have more than just a few things that can prove a Conspiracy !!!!!!!!!!!
--- End quote ---
First, you have nothing at all which proves a conspiracy. Period.
Second, if that Carcano was such a bad weapon, am I to assume that you'd have no problem standing eighty-eight yards away from someone who was aiming that exact rifle at you and ready to squeeze the trigger? Yeah right.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version