Prayer Woman

[Patrick Jackson]

Not sure if discussed earlier but while staring at all those photos and gifs, I came to a question can this be the same person?
This person is looking outward the TSBD while two women with scarfs are in front of him/her. Check the distinctive left ear shape in Darnel-Wiegman.
If we assume that the person is the same in both films and if Altgens 6 showing Oswald (not Lovelady) as Doorman than this might be the same person, Oswald.
Yes, I know, too many ifs and too poor images to conclude anything but the clue might be good.



Check the GIF bellow, too.
content.invisioncic.com/r16296/monthly_2016_12/Darnell7.gif.f1f3f53f729be48702e577940da3fd35.gif

[Thomas Graves]

Not sure if discussed earlier, but while staring at all those photos and gifs, I came to question can this be the same person?
This person is looking outward from the TSBD while two women with scarves are in front of him/her. Check the distinctive left ear shape in Darnel-Wiegman.
If we assume that the person is the same in both films and if Altgens 6 showing Oswald (not Lovelady) as Doorman then this might be the same person, Oswald.
Yes, I know, too many ifs and too poor images to conclude anything but the clue might be good.

Patrick,

I never realized Oswald was so bald.

-- Tommy 

PS  In your theory, who is "Prayer Man" -- Lee Harvey Oswald, Sarah Stanton, or someone else?

PPS  What clue?

[Patrick Jackson]

Patrick,

I never realized Oswald was so bald.

-- Tommy 

PS  In your theory, who is "Prayer Man" -- Lee Harvey Oswald, Sarah Stanton, or someone else?

Neither was Lovelady but people still believe this was Lovelady.

On the second look, why do you think that this person was "so bald"? The Sun was strong so it was not needed to be bald at all but short, bright hair would create the image we see, too.

[Thomas Graves]

Neither was Lovelady but people still believe this was Lovelady.

On the second look, why do you think that this person was "so bald"? The Sun was strong so it was not needed to be bald at all but short, bright hair would create the image we see, too.

Patrick,

I find you very hard to understand.

What do you mean when you say, "Neither was Lovelady"?

Lovelady wasn't what, Patrick?

Lovelady wasn't something, too?

Yes, we have no bananas?

LOL

-- Tommy 

[Patrick Jackson]

Patrick,

I find you very hard to understand.

What do you mean when you say, "Neither was Lovelady"?

Lovelady wasn't what, Patrick?

Lovelady wasn't something, too?

Yes, we have no bananas?

LOL

-- Tommy 

Bold.

[Thomas Graves]

I clearly see four persons, not sure what "?" is. Persons marked 1, 2, 3, 4 are looking towards the TSBD entrance and person circled in red seems to look outwards. What I see is fair resemblance in shapes and shades between Wiegman and Darnel frames considering the person circled in red so this makes me conclude this person is looking outwards. It is another question who this person is. If we assume it is the same person than it might be Lovelady or Oswald depending on who you believe Doorman person was.

Patrick,

We already know that "Doorman" in Altgens-6 and the person circled in red in the Wiegman frame (above, on the previous page) are the same person -- Billy Lovelady.

Sorry, dude, but you're wasting our time here.

Why don't you go register at the JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum and read up on the subject matter?

-- Tommy 

[John Iacoletti]

Suffice it to say that then-25-year-old John Templin is visible to the immediate left of your "glasses woman" in Betzner-3, and that both he and 37 year-old, fedora-wearing Brandt can be seen standing next to each other in Willis-5 (I'm typing this post on my android and at 69 years of age I'm somewhat techonogically challenged, so I'm afraid you're  going to look them up, yourself).

I?m not sure how this demonstrates that glasses-woman is Calvery. Or even that Templin is correctly identified for that matter. Or that tall woman in Zapruder is even the same person as glasses woman in Betzner. You haven?t connected the dots at all.

But even if glasses-woman is Calvery, you still haven?t demonstrated that black-blob in Darnell is the same as glasses woman other than a totally subjective claim that you think the sweater somehow matches or that you think you see a stripe. It?s all conjecture. Which is fine, but don?t think it?s proof of anything.