Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1117498 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #658 on: July 20, 2018, 01:10:40 AM »
Alan,
the hand on the door and the man on the landing who's shadow Chris was interested in are about 3 quarters of door's width away from each other, perhaps.

...
All I'm seeing, Barry, is that the shadow hits his head as soon as both legs have straightened up on the landing. Completely different to what we see with 'Upper Lovelady'!

We must have crossed wires somewhere Alan because the guy I'm talking about never reaches the landing.
Behind the cop with hand on door in the closer scene, Chris saw shadow only on right side of head, I'm saying when he lowers his head he gets caught, just the very top of it on the left.
 

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #659 on: July 20, 2018, 01:19:51 AM »
We must have crossed wires somewhere Alan because the guy I'm talking about never reaches the landing.
Behind the cop with hand on door in the closer scene, Chris saw shadow only on right side of head, I'm saying when he lowers his head he gets caught, just the very top of it on the left.
 

Mea culpa, Barry!
Do you mean this guy?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #660 on: July 20, 2018, 02:06:19 AM »
Np of course Alan, yes that be him :)
In the other footage though, not CNN, top of his skull goes dark?

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #661 on: July 20, 2018, 02:15:08 AM »
Np of course Alan, yes that be him   :)

 Thumb1:

Quote
In the other footage though, not CNN, top of his skull goes dark?

This footage (disregarding red frame)?



I don't see any shadow tbh, just dark hair?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #662 on: July 20, 2018, 02:31:45 AM »
Minor trivia.
That checked looking suit marks that closer footage as Sanderson's IIRC.



^
Yes that's it Alan, guy with no hat on left, I see his head entering the darkness but I could be wrong, might be hair product but it's close to the magic zone.







Offline Chris Davidson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #663 on: July 20, 2018, 03:10:44 AM »
Neither of these is a shadow-----it's the momentarily dark background (one step down) + the fact that the man's body is angled sideways to camera. The only shadow is when the cop behind him comes up close.



The matter is very simple: the position of the sun in the sky makes it IMPOSSIBLE for a shadow to explain the dark vertical strip on Lovelady in all the Wiegman frames. And there is NO human body in Lovelady's vicinity to cast a shadow, vertical or otherwise, down his side!


Point being made:
The man traversed by the "momentarily dark background" has no shadow cast upon his head, while he is one step down and after he steps up on the landing.
If he turns and faces the camera as Lovelady is, there will not be a shadow across the front of his face either.
 

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #664 on: July 20, 2018, 06:27:04 AM »
It's ASTONISHING how much irrational hostility the LHO/PM claim arouses in some people. You almost get the impression some people--------and not just LNers------want to close down any possibility of this case being solved!


What is MOST ASTONISHING is the hostility directed towards those who dispute any LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerMan Theory.

So, "you almost get the impression some people-------and not just LNers-------want to close down any possibility of this case being solved!" means what?

Certainly, claiming the SecondFloorLunchRoomEncounter to be a 'Hoax', and moving LHO away from said encounter to place him on the landing/stairs during the assassination will not address 'this case being solved'.

Based on my understanding of the evidence, the LHO/PM Theory, in my conclusion is indicative of a Hoax.


In any event, should there be any legally binding reliable provable statement/testimony with evidentiary value, it should be available among the linked to witnesses account of the assassination and situational event(s).


WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-MrBonnieWilliams:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/williams.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-MrBuellFrazier:
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/frazierb1.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-JamesJarmanJr:
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/m_j_russ/jarman.htm
FederalBureauOfInvestigationTESTIMONY-MsPaulineSanders on 11/24/'63:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/exhibits/ce1434.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-MrsRobert[Jeraldean]Reid:
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/reid.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-MrBillyLovelady on 04/07/'64:
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/lovelady.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-DPD OfficerMrMarrionBaker:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/baker_m1.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-TSBD ManagerMrRoyTruly:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/truly1.htm
WarrenCommissionTESTIMONY-MrDannyArce on 04/07/'64:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/arce.htm


 Should additional TESTIMONY and/or STATEMENT(S) be sought-should be available@:
https://www.history-matters.com/analysis/witness/index.htm


« Last Edit: March 08, 2019, 09:40:15 PM by Larry Trotter »