Buell Wesley Frazier

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 537049 times)

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #448 on: March 06, 2025, 01:09:49 PM »

At least you understand a 27 inch package does not match the description of what Linnie Mae saw LHO carrying. It could only be the 42 inches length she originally estimated.
Sorry I don't - a shorter length does not refute what she saw. I think I said that at least 3 times now.

Actually, I don't know what you are arguing anymore.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1329
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #449 on: March 06, 2025, 02:14:54 PM »
Sorry I don't - a shorter length does not refute what she saw. I think I said that at least 3 times now.

Actually, I don't know what you are arguing anymore.

Well here let me refresh it for you. We weren’t arguing, at least four times I have explained a 27-inch bag cannot be carried in the manner Linnie Mae Randle described. It is simply true. You side stepped, changed the subject, and evaded the whole issue without ever explaining how LHO could have carried it in the manner she described without having been bent over at the waist. In turn it called into question BWF’s recounting of the length of the package which led you down a dark path about BWF with Fritz being at the center of the story of a conspiracy.

Does that help? If you want to ignore it then ignore it, but it will not make the issue go away. Funny how such a simple little detail, the bag being carried barely above the ground and the left hand supporting it down low, can define the whole event.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1329
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #450 on: March 06, 2025, 02:36:03 PM »
The information I provided is factual. It's on record. You fell flat on your face again.

Thanks for the update. I did not know you had provided any worthwhile information at all.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #451 on: March 06, 2025, 02:39:52 PM »
Well here let me refresh it for you. We weren’t arguing, at least four times I have explained a 27-inch bag cannot be carried in the manner Linnie Mae Randle described. It is simply true. You side stepped, changed the subject, and evaded the whole issue without ever explaining how LHO could have carried it in the manner she described without having been bent over at the waist. In turn it called into question BWF’s recounting of the length of the package which led you down a dark path about BWF with Fritz being at the center of the story of a conspiracy.

Does that help? If you want to ignore it then ignore it, but it will not make the issue go away. Funny how such a simple little detail, the bag being carried barely above the ground and the left hand supporting it down low, can define the whole event.

How is he bent over? - if the package is shorter - he holds in the manner she had seen.
How does a shorter package restrict the way he held it, if he can reach both portions
One hand near the top -  the other for support at the bottom. I seriously don't understand your point.

It is certainly is NO proof the package is longer than about 2 feet. 
« Last Edit: March 06, 2025, 02:48:44 PM by Michael Capasse »

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1329
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #452 on: March 06, 2025, 02:49:15 PM »
Why does Lee have to carry the package in the same manner as seen by LMR?

You are kidding me, right? Was someone else carrying a package that morning?

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #453 on: March 06, 2025, 02:53:39 PM »
You are kidding me, right? Was someone else carrying a package that morning?

 :D It has been corrected.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2025, 02:56:31 PM by Michael Capasse »

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #454 on: March 06, 2025, 04:47:22 PM »
Thanks for the update. I did not know you had provided any worthwhile information at all.

I'm aware that facts don't worry you too much, so how would you have noticed? Carry on. ROFL.