Odum deferred to the FBI document. That was him saying that he believed that he did show the bullet to Tomlinson and Wright on June 12, 1964. Tomlinson and Wright told him that the bullet appeared to be the same one that they handled on Nov 22, 1963. Tomlinson thought it might have been Shanklin who showed him the bullet. He was wrong. And his memory was way off as far as time goes. That fact is evidenced by CD1258 and by the the Airtel of SAC Dallas that you referred to. And I'll just note here that, contrary to what you claimed, that Airtel and the information on page 3 of CD1258 do not conflict with one another. They both say that Tomlinson and Wright were unable to positively identify CE-399 as the bullet that they handled on Nov 22, 1963.
Odum deferred to the FBI document. That was him saying that he believed that he did show the bullet to Tomlinson and Wright on June 12, 1964.No, that's what you want to believe.
Tomlinson and Wright told him that the bullet appeared to be the same one that they handled on Nov 22, 1963.No, according to CE 2011 only Tomlinson said that and even that wasn't true
Tomlinson thought it might have been Shanklin who showed him the bullet. He was wrong. And his memory was way off as far as time goes.Nope... Have you read the transcript of the Marcus interview?
Tomlinson was sure that he was shown a bullet once by an FBI officer and he told Marcus that it was Shanklin and about a week after the assassination.
In his WC deposition he said;
Mr. SPECTER. Have you been interviewed about this matter by any other Federal representative?
Mr. TOMLINSON. Yes.
Mr. SPECTER. Who interviewed you about it?
Mr. TOMLINSON. I don't remember the name of either one of them, but one was the FBI man and one was the Secret Service man.
Mr. SPECTER. How many times did the FBI interview you?
Mr. TOMLINSON. Once.
Mr. SPECTER. How many times did the Secret Service interview you?
Mr. TOMLINSON. Once.
Mr. SPECTER. When did the FBI interview you?
Mr. TOMLINSON. I believe they were the first to do it.
Mr. SPECTER. Approximately when was that?
Mr. TOMLINSON. I think that was the latter part of November.
Mr. SPECTER. And when did the Secret Service interview you?
Mr. TOMLINSON. Approximately a week later, the first part of December.
There is in fact a report, dated 12/05/63, by Secret Service Agent Roger C. Warner in which he confirms interviewing Tomlinson, at Parkland Hospital, on December 4, 1963.
Tomlinson was spot on!
That fact is evidenced by CD1258 and by the the Airtel of SAC Dallas that you referred to. And I'll just note here that, contrary to what you claimed, that Airtel and the information on page 3 of CD1258 do not conflict with one another. They both say that Tomlinson and Wright were unable to positively identify CE-399 as the bullet that they handled on Nov 22, 1963.Nobody disputes that, according to the Shanklin's Airtel, Tomlinson and Wright were unable to identify CE 399. What is in dispute is that they said that the bullet appeared to be the same one that they handled on Nov 22, 1963. On that point CE 2011 and the Airtel do conflict with eachother.
Now, let me tell you with I think possibly happened. When the WC asked the FBI to confirm the chain of evidence for an number of items, including CE 399, Shanklin understood he had a problem as soon as he saw the bullet that was send to him in June 1964. I believe Shanklin did in fact show a bullet to Wright and Tomlinson about a week after the assassination and, at that time, it actually was the bullet that Tomlinson had found. So, when Shanklin saw the bullet in June 1964 he instantly knew that it wasn't the bullet he had shown to Tomlinson and Wright. Rather than actually show this bullet and risk getting a denial from both men, he solved the problem by simply claiming in his Airtel that Tomlinson and Wright could not identify the bullet. Can I prove that? No, but it is a plausible explanation once you get beyond the belief that no evidence in this case was manipulated.