Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain

[Michael Capasse]

Humes never said anything about receiving a bullet with the bone fragments and Young never said he saw a bullet so where is the evidence a bullet was received at Bethesda

Lame excuses every time you post and fall flat on your face (again).
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md69/pages/md69_0001a.gif

22 November 1963

From: Francis X. O’Neill, Jr., Agent FBI
James W. Sibert, Agent, FBI
To: Captain J.H. Stover, Jr., Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Medical School, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

1. We hereby acknowledge receipt of a missile [sic] removed by Commander James J. Humes, MC, USN on this date.

(signed)
Francis X. O’Neill, Jr.
(signed)
James W. Sibert

[Mitch Todd]

Lame excuses every time you post and fall flat on your face (again).
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md69/pages/md69_0001a.gif

22 November 1963

From: Francis X. O’Neill, Jr., Agent FBI
James W. Sibert, Agent, FBI
To: Captain J.H. Stover, Jr., Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Medical School, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

1. We hereby acknowledge receipt of a missile [sic] removed by Commander James J. Humes, MC, USN on this date.

(signed)
Francis X. O’Neill, Jr.
(signed)
James W. Sibert

Note that the "missle" was "removed by Commander James J. Humes." That is, it was removed from the body during the autopsy, rather than received in from outside. It can't be anything found in the limo and delivered to Bethesda, as Young would have it.

BTW, while "missile" can in this context refer to a bullet, it can also refer to a bullet fragment, bone fragment, tooth, button, or any other object propelled through a body by external force.

[Michael Capasse]

Note that the "missle" was "removed by Commander James J. Humes." That is, it was removed from the body during the autopsy, rather than received in from outside. It can't be anything found in the limo and delivered to Bethesda, as Young would have it.

BTW, while "missile" can in this context refer to a bullet, it can also refer to a bullet fragment, bone fragment, tooth, button, or any other object propelled through a body by external force.

Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse 

[Mark A. Oblazney]

Here is an actual account written by Captain James Young on 11/21/2013. The only mention of any bullets was when he was writing about the bullets that had struck JFK. Nothing about a bullet being found in the limo.

https://www.med.navy.mil/Media/News/Article/2608993/what-price-a-rose-a-navy-physician-remembers-nov-22-1963/

Do you ever bother to vet the horseshit stories you post?

What price the roses indeed. Yeah, mom’s cousin Jerry O’Leary and Hugh Aynesworth
were pretty busy running around that day, trying to make sense of the madness. 

[John Corbett]

It is a common practice by the CT community when they come across an anomaly or discrepancy to automatically assume it is evidence of a conspiracy instead asking themselves if there is a non-sinister explanation available. In just about every case there is as this incident reveals but the CTs thrive on assuming the most sinister explanation is the correct one.

[Michael Capasse]

It is a common practice by the CT community when they come across an anomaly or discrepancy to automatically assume it is evidence of a conspiracy instead asking themselves if there is a non-sinister explanation available. In just about every case there is as this incident reveals but the CTs thrive on assuming the most sinister explanation is the correct one.

it is common practice for nutters to explain these discrepancies away with lame excuses.
  they just pile up. every one. every time.

[John Corbett]

it is common practice for nutters to explain these discrepancies away with lame excuses.
  they just pile up. every one. every time.

What you call excuses is nothing more than applying critical thinking. Rather than assume every discrepancy is evidence of a conspiracy we ask ourselves whether there is a more mundane, less sinister explanation available. Invariably, there is one and it is the far more likely choice than the sinister one.