Fourth Edition of "Forensic Science and President Kennedy's Head Wounds"

[Michael T. Griffith]

For those who might be interested, I have web-published a revised and expanded version of my article "Forensic Science and President Kennedy's Head Wounds." Here is the link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYMrT9P4ab2BtENAqI_0dQSEY6IJWczi/view?usp=sharing

This is the fourth edition of the article.

[Tom Graves]

For those who might be interested, I have web-published a revised and expanded version of my article "Forensic Science and President Kennedy's Head Wounds." Here is the link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYMrT9P4ab2BtENAqI_0dQSEY6IJWczi/view?usp=sharing

This is the fourth edition of the article.

Dear Michael T. "Useful Idiot" Griffith,

Speaking of heads, perhaps you should have yours examined.

-- Tom

[John Corbett]

For those who might be interested, I have web-published a revised and expanded version of my article "Forensic Science and President Kennedy's Head Wounds." Here is the link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYMrT9P4ab2BtENAqI_0dQSEY6IJWczi/view?usp=sharing

This is the fourth edition of the article.

Nobody cares, at least not coming from an amateur like yourself with zero training or experience in the field of forensic medicine.

Why did you need a fourth edition? Did the first three suck?

[Michael T. Griffith]

Dear Michael T. "Useful Idiot" Griffith,

Speaking of heads, perhaps you should have yours examined.

-- Tom

Nobody cares, at least not coming from an amateur like yourself with zero training or experience in the field of forensic medicine.

Why did you need a fourth edition? Did the first three suck?

Of course these two oddballs immediately dismiss the article, clearly without bothering to read it.

As some here may know, Corbett has proven he can't even read English at a high-school level, while Graves continues to accuse anyone who disagrees with him of being a witting or unwitting Russian asset. It's a tossup as to which one of them is the oddest and farthest on the fringe.

Graves goes back and forth between calling me "Comrade" (a witting Russian asset) and "Useful Idiot" (an unwitting Russian asset).

But at least Graves is able to understand English at a high-school level, whereas Corbett has committed astounding gaffes because he failed to comprehend even short quoted statements that were presented to him numerous times.

[John Corbett]

Of course these two oddballs immediately dismiss the article, clearly without bothering to read it.

If you are familiar with the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf, you have your answer as to why we didn't bother to read it.

As some here may know, Corbett has proven he can't even read English at a high-school level, while Graves continues to accuse anyone who disagrees with him of being a witting or unwitting Russian asset. It's a tossup as to which one of them is the oddest and farthest on the fringe.

Now there are some impressive arguments for a JFKA conspiracy.

Graves goes back and forth between calling me "Comrade" (a witting Russian asset) and "Useful Idiot" (an unwitting Russian asset).

But at least Graves is able to understand English at a high-school level, whereas Corbett has committed astounding gaffes because he failed to comprehend even short quoted statements that were presented to him numerous times.

I will confess that your arguments make no sense to me.

[Tom Graves]

Graves goes back and forth between calling me "Comrade" (a witting Russian asset) and "Useful Idiot" (an unwitting Russian asset).

Dear Comrade Michael T. "Useful Idiot" Griffith,

Thanks for throwing the "unwitting" in there.

I may start to like you, yet, Comrade.

-- Tom