Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Another Missed Shot That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain  (Read 3048 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Yes, exactly.

Notice he still has not explained what else could have hit the grass in such a way as to make Officer Foster feel certain that a bullet had hit the grass.

I don't need to explain it. You do. You are the one who has postulated that the hole in the turf is a bullet hole. The burden is on you to provide the evidence to support that. You have failed miserably.
Quote

Of course, to believe his lme denial, we'd have to believe that Lt. Day merely repeated what he'd heard, that the police inspector who talked with Dudman merely repeated what he'd heard, and that Walters' wife was lying when she said her husband told her they found a bullet in the grass.

All hearsay. Not one of these people is on record as saying they saw a bullet. [/quote]

And I guess we're supposed to believe that it means nothing that photos show that the man in the suit leaned down, put his hand in the hole, brought his hand upward with the hand cupped, and then put his hand in his pocket.
[/quote]

Tell us who that man was and what he said he found? Cite a source for these alleged photos so we can judge for ourselves what they show.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 981
I don't need to explain it. You do. You are the one who has postulated that the hole in the turf is a bullet hole. The burden is on you to provide the evidence to support that. You have failed miserably.
All hearsay. Not one of these people is on record as saying they saw a bullet.

And I guess we're supposed to believe that it means nothing that photos show that the man in the suit leaned down, put his hand in the hole, brought his hand upward with the hand cupped, and then put his hand in his pocket.


Tell us who that man was and what he said he found? Cite a source for these alleged photos so we can judge for ourselves what they show.

Garbage - Take it up with the Fort Worth Star Telegram, the picture and caption was in their paper and on their website.
Three witness confirm a bullet in the grass. You just don't like what they said.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:49:11 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Garbage - Take it up with the Fort Worth Star Telegram, the picture and caption was in their paper and on their website.
Three witness confirm a bullet in the grass. You just don't like what they said.

Tell us who those witnesses were and what they said they saw.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 981
Tell us who those witnesses were and what they said they saw.

already posted.
You would know that after having falsely tagged it as hear-say 
« Last Edit: Today at 01:19:39 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
already posted.
You would know that after having falsely tagged it as hear-say 

 BS: BS: BS: BS: BS:

The standard CT dodge when asked to produce evidence that doesn't exist. In the last few days, MTG has resorted to this 3 times. Anthony Marsh was famous for this tactic on McAdams' forum. He would invariably follow it up with "Learn to google".

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 981
BS: BS: BS: BS: BS:

The standard CT dodge when asked to produce evidence that doesn't exist. In the last few days, MTG has resorted to this 3 times. Anthony Marsh was famous for this tactic on McAdams' forum. He would invariably follow it up with "Learn to google".

What dodge? U are already aware two of them have been posted on the second page of this thread.
 :D Are stalling for time or is it just lame excuses to somehow hold it together?
« Last Edit: Today at 01:35:14 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
What dodge? U are already aware two of them have been posted on the second page of this thread.
 :D Are stalling for time or is it just lame excuses to somehow hold it together?

You said three witnesses confirm a bullet in the grass. On the second page of this thread you posted this:

Richard Dudman | The Republic 12/21/63
"A group of police officers were examining the area at the side of the street where the President was hit,
and a police inspector told me they had just found another bullet in the grass.“

Dallas Times Herald 11/23/63
"Dallas Police Lt. J. C. Day of the crime lab estimated the distance from the sixth-floor window...
to the spot where one of the bullets was recovered at 100 yards.”

You cited Dudman saying somebody told him he saw a bullet. That's hearsay. Dudman did not say he saw a bullet.

There is no record of Day saying he saw a bullet. There is no record of anyone saying he saw a bullet. All of this nonsense comes from embellishments of things people said they heard, not something they actually saw.

We can safely label claims that somebody saw a bullet in the grass or saw a bullet taken from the grass as total  BS:
« Last Edit: Today at 01:46:38 PM by John Corbett »