Contrary to MTG's premise as stated in the title of this thread, the Tague wounding does nothing to refute the lone gunman theory. There is no definitive proof as to which shot caused Tague's wound and that uncertainty would exist whether or not there was one shooter. Adding a second shooter does not provide us with definitive answer as to how Tague's wound was caused. The same mystery would exist even if there had been a second shooter behind JFK so Tague's wound offers no light on the issue of whether Oswald was the lone gunman. There is ample evidence Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and there is zero evidence of another shooter in Dealey Plaza on that day.
