On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 43, Bugliosi vs. Meagher

[Fred Litwin]

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 43, Bugliosi vs. Meagher

Professor Robert Vitt and I discuss how Sylvia Meagher treats Vincent Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald.
I also include a document which examines all 53 pieces of evidence

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-43-bugliosi-vs-meagher

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 43, Bugliosi vs. Meagher

In this blog post, I include a file that you can download that includes Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence against Oswald and how Meagher treats that evidence in her book, Accessories After the Fact. Get your copy now...

[Michael T. Griffith]

Bugliosi did in fact identify many errors and distortions that Meagher made in her book Accessories After the Fact, but he also ignored the many valid, factual points that she made. About 65% of her arguments are valid, and about 45% are either invalid or are downright misleading and are based on a severe misrepresentation of her sources.

However, Bugliosi committed a proportionate number of errors and distortions in his book Reclaiming History.

For those who might be interested, here are some of the critical scholarly reviews of Bugliosi's book:

Dr. Gary Aguilar's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Review_of_Reclaiming_History.html

Dr. David Wrone's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Vincent_Bugliosis_Misnamed_Reclaiming_History.html

Michael Green's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Besmirching_History.html

Pat Speer's review:
https://www.reclaiminghistory.org/speer_2007-07-24.htm
 
Dr. Don Thomas's reviews:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Rewriting_History_-_Bugliosi_Parses_the_Testimony.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi.html

Former HSCA investigator Gaeton Fonzi's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Reply_From_a_Conspiracy_Believer.html

Dr. Jerry McKnight's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Bugliosi_Fails_to_Resuscitate_the_Single-Bullet_Theory.html

Dr. Josiah Thompson's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Epic_Book_Resurrects_Finding_That_Oswald_Acted_Alone_in_killing_JFK.html

[John Corbett]

Bugliosi did in fact identify many errors and distortions that Meagher made in her book Accessories After the Fact, but he also ignored the many valid, factual points that she made. About 65% of her arguments are valid, and about 45% are either invalid or are downright misleading and are based on a severe misrepresentation of her sources.

That's 110%. I guess arithmetic isn't your strong suit.

However, Bugliosi committed a proportionate number of errors and distortions in his book Reclaiming History.

For those who might be interested, here are some of the critical scholarly reviews of Bugliosi's book:

Dr. Gary Aguilar's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Review_of_Reclaiming_History.html

Dr. David Wrone's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Vincent_Bugliosis_Misnamed_Reclaiming_History.html

Michael Green's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Besmirching_History.html

Pat Speer's review:
https://www.reclaiminghistory.org/speer_2007-07-24.htm
 
Dr. Don Thomas's reviews:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Rewriting_History_-_Bugliosi_Parses_the_Testimony.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi.html

Former HSCA investigator Gaeton Fonzi's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Reply_From_a_Conspiracy_Believer.html

Dr. Jerry McKnight's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Bugliosi_Fails_to_Resuscitate_the_Single-Bullet_Theory.html

Dr. Josiah Thompson's review:
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Epic_Book_Resurrects_Finding_That_Oswald_Acted_Alone_in_killing_JFK.html

Looks like you have rounded up all the usual kooks and a few I've never heard of before.