Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

[Tom Graves]

A question for all the tinfoil-hat JFKA CTs out there:

How many evil, evil, bad guys were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the planting of more evidence, the getting-away, the film-and-photo-and-XRAY-altering, the wound altering, the casket-switching, and the all-important (and obviously ongoing!) cover up?

Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

Oh yeah, and was it Peter Dale Scott's "Deep State," Jimmy DiEugenio's "National Security State," or Steve Bannon's "Deep State" / "Administrative State"?

[John Corbett]

If they are able to answer the initial question, the follow up question becomes: How do you put together such a massive conspiracy without exposing the plot ahead of time. Think of all the law enforcement officers and government officials that would have to be approached and get on board. Are we supposed to believe all these people were made aware of this plot and every single one of them signed on? All it would take would be for one of these people to blow the whistle on the whole operation. Are we supposed to believe JFK was so universally despised that all these people conspired to kill him? Not one decent person spoke up to stop the assassination from being carried out. Even if one believes that is remotely possible, how would the plotters KNOW they would get 100% cooperation? If they approached even one person who refused to go all, it would have been game over.

The questions also apply if one theorizes all these people got on board the cover up AFTER the assassination. The plotters would have had to know IN ADBANCE that they were going to get 100% cooperation from the people they needed to engineer the cover up. Then they would have to get that 100% cooperation for the cover up to be successful. Not one whistle blower in the whole operation.

I can't decide which of these scenarios is the more ludicrous.

[Bill Brown]

"We have positively identified eleven of the three assassins."