Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Joe Simmons

Author Topic: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis  (Read 658 times)

Online James Slater

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #28 on: Today at 10:43:38 AM »
If JBC had been standing, he probably would have already fallen by this frame.

But he wasn't standing.

He was sitting.
You've seen the reaction already in Kennedy, his arms are up. According to Specter's single bullet theory Connally by this frame has already been shot to pieces yet there is no reaction. He is still holding his hat in the shattered right radius of his arm. Kennedy reacts but Connally is superman?
John and Nell Connally both testified that the shot which hit Kennedy came before the one which struck JBC and this frame proves they were telling the truth.
If you took this frame/photograph to a modern forensic pathologist and told him/her that Kennedy was shot sustaining one injury and JBC at this point had sustained multiple life threatening injures - you'd be laughed out of the building and I've met plenty of pathologists.
Give it up, the joke is over.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #28 on: Today at 10:43:38 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4050
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #29 on: Today at 11:14:37 AM »
You've seen the reaction already in Kennedy, his arms are up. According to Specter's single bullet theory Connally by this frame has already been shot to pieces yet there is no reaction. He is still holding his hat in the shattered right radius of his arm. Kennedy reacts but Connally is superman?

John and Nell Connally both testified that the shot which hit Kennedy came before the one which struck JBC and this frame proves they were telling the truth.

If you took this frame/photograph to a modern forensic pathologist and told him/her that Kennedy was shot sustaining one injury and JBC at this point had sustained multiple life threatening injures - you'd be laughed out of the building and I've met plenty of pathologists.

Give it up, the joke is over.

Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda

Online James Slater

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #30 on: Today at 11:37:39 AM »
Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda
Tom, are you here to genuinely research what happened to the 35th president of the United states or are you here to be disruptive, rude and argumentative just for the sake of it?
"Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda"? That ain't gonna help ya son in an intelligent debate, in fact its an admission that you have lost the argument and have nothing more to add.
C'mon, you can do better than that I'm sure.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4050
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #31 on: Today at 11:53:42 AM »
Tom, are you here to genuinely research what happened to the 35th president of the United states or are you here to be disruptive, rude and argumentative just for the sake of it?
"Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda Yadda"? That ain't gonna help ya son in an intelligent debate, in fact its an admission that you have lost the argument and have nothing more to add.
C'mon, you can do better than that I'm sure.

Dude, judging your age from your profile photo, I've been researching the JFK assassination since before you were born.

(I, too, used to be a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist.)
« Last Edit: Today at 12:04:45 PM by Tom Graves »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1937
Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #32 on: Today at 12:04:51 PM »
You've seen the reaction already in Kennedy, his arms are up. According to Specter's single bullet theory Connally by this frame has already been shot to pieces yet there is no reaction.

Why do you continue to ignore JBC's right arm flip which began at the precise moment JFK's arms went upward. I think that's called willful ignorance.
Quote

He is still holding his hat in the shattered right radius of his arm.

The only reason you can see him holding his hat in his hand is because his arm has flipped upward.
Quote


Kennedy reacts but Connally is superman?

Both of them reacted in much the same way, by flipping their arms upward. Immediately after the arm flip which lasted about a half second, JBC turned and dipped dramatically to his right. Once one recognizes JBC's obvious arm flip, one realizes there was no time lag between when they both reacted to being shot.
Quote


John and Nell Connally both testified that the shot which hit Kennedy came before the one which struck JBC and this frame proves they were telling the truth.
If you took this frame/photograph to a modern forensic pathologist and told him/her that Kennedy was shot sustaining one injury and JBC at this point had sustained multiple life threatening injures - you'd be laughed out of the building and I've met plenty of pathologists.
Give it up, the joke is over.

John Connally had no way of knowing whether JFK had been hit by the first or second shot. Nellie could not have observed both her husband and JFK at the same time. She first turned and saw JFK had been shot, then turned back to see JBC had been shot. This gave her the false impression that they had been hit by separate shots.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Gary Aguilar's Two-Shot Analysis
« Reply #32 on: Today at 12:04:51 PM »