Author Topic: Doc Declassified by DJT Reveals Russia Tried To Help Him Win the 2020 Election  (Read 16564 times)

Viewing This Topic: 0 Members

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6184
That was settled properly within a month.
 :D Trump is delusional to still insist he won 2020 - either that or it's a con.

Hillary still claims that she lost the 2016 election due to Russian interference.  One of the most outlandish and baseless conspiracy theories in history.  At least Trump's complaints about the 2020 elections has some validity given the statistical outlier in terms of the votes cast and the changes in the voting laws of almost every state in the months leading up to the election.  Imagine if the Republicans had changed the voting laws just before the 2020 election and those changes were the difference in the outcome.   The Dems would forever be claiming it was stolen.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Hillary still claims that she lost the 2016 election due to Russian interference.  One of the most outlandish and baseless conspiracy theories in history.  At least Trump's complaints about the 2020 elections has some validity given the statistical outlier in terms of the votes cast and the changes in the voting laws of almost every state in the months leading up to the election.  Imagine if the Republicans had changed the voting laws just before the 2020 election and those changes were the difference in the outcome.   The Dems would forever be claiming it was stolen.

Hillary still claims that she lost the 2016 election due to Russian interference. 

Really? - I never heard that - post the last time she did.
I know she didn't gripe about it for six years and rave about it like a loon.
or continue to directly undermine the elections in this country

At least Trump's complaints about the 2020 elections has some validity given the statistical outlier in terms of the votes cast and the changes in the voting laws of almost every state in the months leading up to the election.  .

There is absolutely NOTHINGvalid about Trumps 2020 election gripes
He lost. - It was tried and failed in appeal over 60 times.
If you don't believe that - then show some kind of proof
« Last Edit: Today at 08:52:33 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6184
Really? - I never heard that - post the last time she did.
I know she didn't gripe about it for six years and rave about it like a loon.
or continue to directly undermine the elections in this country

There is absolutely NOTHING valid about Trumps 2020 election gripes
He lost. - It was tried and failed in appeal over 60 times.
If you don't believe that - then show some kind of proof

Nothing valid?  What exactly are you taking issue with?  The statistical outlier in terms of the number of votes cast?  The fact that the elections laws were changed in almost every state in the months leading up to the election?  That the margin of victory in several key states was a direct result of the election law changes? Those are just facts. The rules were changed using COVID as a fake pretext.  Those changes had a direct impact on the outcome.  Trump wins easily without them. 

"Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton argued Wednesday that Russian meddling in the 2016 election in large part cost her the White House, and said she was "leaning" toward believing that President Trump's campaign did, indeed, collude with the Russians.

During an interview at Recode's Code Conference, Clinton argued that the Russians "could not have known how best to weaponize" damaging information about her campaign and fake news stories perpetrated on social media unless they had been "guided" by Americans."

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Nothing valid?  What exactly are you taking issue with?  The statistical outlier in terms of the number of votes cast?  The fact that the elections laws were changed in almost every state in the months leading up to the election?  That the margin of victory in several key states was a direct result of the election law changes? Those are just facts. The rules were changed using COVID as a fake pretext.  Those changes had a direct impact on the outcome.  Trump wins easily without them. 

"Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton argued Wednesday that Russian meddling in the 2016 election in large part cost her the White House, and said she was "leaning" toward believing that President Trump's campaign did, indeed, collude with the Russians.

During an interview at Recode's Code Conference, Clinton argued that the Russians "could not have known how best to weaponize" damaging information about her campaign and fake news stories perpetrated on social media unless they had been "guided" by Americans."

When did she say that? 2017? One time. - She didn't gripe about it for six years and undermine the process.
Given now what we've learned in the past few days, Re; ties to Russian Data Centers - she may not be off base.

Nothing valid?  What exactly are you taking issue with?  The statistical outlier in terms of the number of votes cast?  The fact that the elections laws were changed in almost every state in the months leading up to the election?  That the margin of victory in several key states was a direct result of the election law changes? Those are just facts. The rules were changed using COVID as a fake pretext.  Those changes had a direct impact on the outcome.  Trump wins easily without them. 

There was no change in any law that affected or undermined Trump's ballot count. He had the same
opportunity as Biden in all states. That is just BS. Trump lost. 

The actual fraud was the "Fake Electors Scheme" in each of the red states he did lose.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:52:18 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6184
When did she say that? 2017? One time. - She didn't gripe about it for six years and undermine the process.
Given now what we've learned in the past few days, Re; ties to Russian Data Centers - she may not be off base.

There was no change in any law that affected or undermined Trump's ballot count. He had the same
opportunity as Biden in all states. That is just BS. Trump lost. 

The actual fraud was the "Fake Electors Scheme" in each of the red states he did lose.

corrected; invalid

Do you have cause to believe Hillary has changed her mind since saying that the Russians cost her the 2016 election?  Is that no longer her position?  If the NBA decided they were going to lower the baskets to one foot just before the NBA finals and a group of midgets then defeated the NY Knicks while scoring a record number of points, most people would deem that to be unfair at best and cheating at worst.  That is what happened in the 2020 election.  COVID was used as a pretext to change the election laws.  Those changes skewed votes to Biden as evidenced by his receiving huge margins from voters who used those new methods to vote while losing big with in person voting.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4412
  • Yuri Nosenko and his beautiful American wife
There is absolutely NOTHING invalid about Trumps 2020 election gripes

Dude, you meant to say "There is nothing VALID about Trump's 2020 election gripes.

Or, if you prefer:

All of Trump's gripes about the 2020 election are INVALID.

(And I agree with you, btw.) _

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Do you have cause to believe Hillary has changed her mind since saying that the Russians cost her the 2016 election?  Is that no longer her position?  If the NBA decided they were going to lower the baskets to one foot just before the NBA finals and a group of midgets then defeated the NY Knicks while scoring a record number of points, most people would deem that to be unfair at best and cheating at worst.  That is what happened in the 2020 election.  COVID was used as a pretext to change the election laws.  Those changes skewed votes to Biden as evidenced by his receiving huge margins from voters who used those new methods to vote while losing big with in person voting.

Quote
Do you have cause to believe Hillary has changed her mind since saying that the Russians cost her the 2016 election?

She conceded the fact that she lost. Trump won't. I don't know what her current position is. I don't care.
She doesn't constantly rave about it and undermine all elections because of it, like another lunatic I know.

Quote
If the NBA decided they were going to lower the baskets to one foot just before the NBA finals and a group of midgets then defeated the NY Knicks while scoring a record number of points, most people would deem that to be unfair at best and cheating at worst.

A dumb hypothetical that has nothing to do with voting.

Quote
That is what happened in the 2020 election.  COVID was used as a pretext to change the election laws.  Those changes skewed votes to Biden as evidenced by his receiving huge margins from voters who used those new methods to vote while losing big with in person voting.

You keep saying that. People vote the way they vote. How does changing laws effect changing of vote.
Trump voters had the same access as Biden - how does that equal fraud? Where did the votes flip?
It is an Electoral College - My guess is; you don't understand how that works.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:13:58 PM by Michael Capasse »